Lin Wood’s “Disturbed Individuals” Letter

“Personally, I think people who immerse themselves in this case on the Internet are disturbed individuals who must not have much of a life and are to be pitied."

From Forum For Justice Forum thread titled, “A warm and fuzzy message from Lin Wood” April 16, 2003

Tricia

Forums for Justice Moderator aka "Pebbles"

Registered: Nov 2001

Location: The "Beehive State" It's true. Look it up

Posts: 2024

A warm and fuzzy message from Lin Wood

Let me start out with my favorite paragraph from my email from Lin Wood.

"If you have any credible information about this case, please contact the District Attorney's office. I prefer not to receive any more e-mails from people who apparently have so much free time on their hands that they become obsessed playing amateur detective. Personally, I think people who immerse themselves in this case on the Internet are disturbed individuals who must not have much of a life and are to be pitied."

Wait. I am way ahead of myself. Let me start from the beginning.

Here is my email to Lin Wood.

Dear Mr. Wood.

After reading your threatening letter to Crime Magazine I felt I had to respond.

You wrote:"...after 6+ years of investigation, the weight of the evidence points toward an intruder as the murderer of JonBenet Ramsey. If you are prepared to print otherwise, be prepared to prove otherwise in a court of law."

Mr. Wood the Ramsey's had a chance to prove "otherwise" in court with the Thomas suit. Yet they chose money over finding out the truth. They chose money over making Thomas admit he was wrong. They chose money over making the publishing company pull the books that called Patsy a murderer.

The book is still being sold. Patsy is still being called a murderer. Thomas did not have to admit he was wrong. Why?

Not one thing has changed since that night on Larry King when John Ramsey said he was going to sue Thomas and prove him wrong. Oh wait yes something has changed. You and the Ramsey's have more money from the Thomas lawsuit.

Mr. Wood I hate to break this to you but your spin on Judge Carnes ruling is not working. No one is buying it.

It is obvious Judge Carnes was presented with old, outdated, evidence that for some reason went unchallenged. Judge Carnes was not presented with the Grand Jury testimony or the Boulder police files.

A lot has changed since Lou Smit's PowerPoint presentation. The judge doesn’t know this but Mr. Wood most of the thinking population does.

A quick call to Keenan’s office today confirmed that Keenan has not cleared the Ramsey’s contrary to what you say. In fact her statement is carefully worded to say the “evidence presented to the judge” points to an intruder. Of course it does. The judge was presented with outdated evidence. If you would like examples I’ll send them to you.

This is your real problem with the Crime Magazine article isn’t it? It’s too close to the truth and far away from the spin. My opinion of course.

An article from the Rocky Mountain News was the basis of my next opinion.

http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/ramsey/article/0,1299,DRMN_1296_1734299,00.html

It's obvious Boulder D.A. Mary Keenan is acting as your puppet to avoid a costly lawsuit. Your apparent “Quid Pro Quo” agreement is downright extortion in my constitutionally protected opinion. I can’t believe this is being allowed to happen. I guess no one in Boulder that has the power to do anything really cares anymore about the murder of JonBenet Ramsey. However I am confidant that will change.

Someone will step forward soon and spill the beans. Just like in the Martha Moxley case.

I am grateful to Crime Magazine and Ryan Ross. In my opinion this article is incredible. Just what the people who really care about bringing the killer to justice needed.

I am hoping Crime Magazine doesn’t fold under your bully tactics.

You are fooling no one Mr. Wood.

Sincerely

Tricia Griffith

t*********.com

Owner www.forumsforjustice.org/forums “A Voice for Victims”

P.S. I see you and Jameson (Susan Bennett) are working together again.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Now here is the Wood email. Funny thing Wood's email went to my spam LOL..

Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 23:09:55 EDT

From: LLWood47@aol.com

To: t*******.com

Subject: Re: Crime Magazine

2 unnamed text/html 2.75 KB

4-15-03

Dear Tricia:

Mr. Ross' article is based on outdated information, false statements and misrepresentations of fact. Like you, Mr. Ross knows very little of the actual evidence in the JonBenet Ramsey murder investigation. I never cease to be amazed at the bias of people like you against the Ramsey family. You do not know them and the tragedy suffered by their family is really none of your business. Yet, you and others elevate yourselves to the role of judge and jury even though you do not know the evidence. And you apparently take pride in circumventing the justice system to accuse people of murder and other illegal acts.

Mary Keenan knows all the evidence. You can continue to fool yourself by trying to "spin" or otherwise explain her statement to your advantage, but you will fail. The weight of all of the evidence points to an intruder. And it is more evidence than Judge Carnes' was able to see and it is more evidence than Lou Smit has previously disclosed. I am comfortable with my representation of innocent people. And I am comfortable with the fact the person now in charge of the investigation is fair and objective and will follow the evidence.

Too bad for you that you are so uncomfortable with the fact that the evidence does not implicate the Ramsey family.

If you have any credible information about this case, please contact the District Attorney's office. I prefer not to receive any more e-mails from people who apparently have so much free time on their hands that they become obsessed playing amateur detective. Personally, I think people who immerse themselves in this case on the Internet are disturbed individuals who must not have much of a life and are to be pitied.

L. Lin Wood

L. LIN WOOD, P.C.

Suite 2140

The Equitable Building

100 Peachtree Street, NW

Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Phone: 404.522.1713

Fax: 404.522.1716

E-mail: llwood@linwoodlaw.com

Internet: http://www.linwoodlaw.com/

``````````````````````````````````````````````

I think he likes me don't you?

I am going bed. This disturbed individual who must not have much of a life and should be pitied, is tired. That's what I get for being an obsessed amateur detective.

More later.

Tricia

Everyone has my full permission to take this post only and post it on any forum. As long as the email is posted in its entirety

__________________

Make a difference. Get everyone you know to sign the petition demanding a special prosecutor in the JonBenet Ramsey case.

www.petitiononline.com/jbr246/petition.html

"Personally, I think people who immerse themselves in this case on the Internet are disturbed individuals who must not have much of a life and are to be pitied." Lin Wood April 15th 2003

Last edited by Tricia on April 16, 2003, 8:45 pm at Wed Apr 16 20:45:50 BST 2003

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

From Forum For Justice Forum thread titled, “A warm and fuzzy message from Lin Wood” April 16, 2003

Watching You

Admin

Registered: Nov 2001

Location: Hornetsville, NY

Posts: 2414

LOLOLOLOLOLOLO

omygawdImaydielaughing

Wood wants to talk "obsession," he ought to talk to himself. Has ANY other civil attorney EVER made it his life's work to advocate for one set of clients? Wood's been making appearances (and threats) on behalf of the Ramseys for the past few years. Has anyone ever seen him do this for his other clients?

As far as I know, no other civil attorney advocates for and personally does PR for his clients the way Lin Wood does for the Ramseys. His e-mail to Tricia reveals a snide and unprofessional tone and shows he lacks certain professional social skills and finesse.

Attorneys wield a certain amount of power that ordinary citizens don't possess. Along with that power comes the responsibility not to let that power override their good sense, if they have any. It is, therefore, not only unprofessional and possibly unethical for an attorney to use bully tactics, thereby misusing that power, it is also unwise for any attorney to become so obsessed and involved with a certain case and certain clients to the point that he personally takes on the responsibility of making public appearances on their behalf and threatening anyone who dares breathe their names. even before they have breathed their names. One has to question the mental competency of anyone who has taken his/her power to such extremes and seems obviously out of control that s/he attacks an ordinary citizen who has the right to give her opinion on anything she wishes.

IMO, Wood assumes a lot. His good friend at the swamp is on her (and everyone else's) forum 24/7. We all KNOW she doesn't have a life, she admits it. Yet, according to hir, she and Wood were good buddies. That sends a message loud and clear - the ones who don't have lives are Wood and his friend jameson. He is too consumed with the Ramseys and wielding his power. Every civil case he has filed has been settled in some way. He's not had to go into court on any of them, but each case settled has swelled his head until he thinks he can bully everyone.

BTW, this is America. How about those terrorists bin Laden and bin Saddam? Do we now have another terrorist named bin Wood? Is that what it's come down to? Can a civil attorney just go around making threats and issuing orders with impunity?

When someone strikes terror into the hearts of ordinary citizens exercising their constitutional rights by manner of threats, that's terrorism. Is it right for an attorney to attack people who gather on an internet forum, calling them "disturbed individuals"? Who made him God and who is he to judge the people who are on the forums? Moreover, does his description of "disturbed individuals" apply also to his pet rock at the swamp and also to himself when he cruises the forums late at night?

An attorney who has "immersed" himself in the Ramsey cause beyond the normal call of duty has a lot of chutzpa to judge others for being interested in the case. It seems he wants to bulldoze his way through everyone to get what he wants, and he doesn't want anyone getting in his way. Is that why he is so spiteful (as seen in his e-mail to Tricia) to "amateur" detectives, LOL? There really isn't that much discussion on FFJ anymore about JBR, but we'll still fight for our right to discuss the case as we see fit. Wood only causes more discussion when he writes inflammatory e-mails like the one he sent to Tricia. Granted, the e-mail was written to Tricia and no one else, but he most likely knew it would be published on the forum. One has to wonder, is that why he did it?

Wood has cut the heart of every disabled and/or otherwise disadvantaged or lonely individual who truly does depend on internet forums to help them through their days with his callous remarks. His "pity," however, is misdirected and should be saved for those who truly need it. There are shut-ins and people with no families at all who spend a lot of time on the forums and who have found some semblance of family there. It is cruel for Wood to classify these very worthy members of society as "disturbed individuals." Most posters have families and jobs and a healthy lifestyle. Some don't have that luxury. Either way, Wood's remarks are out of line and only further demonstrate his willingness to malign others who don't toe the line, according to bin Wood - a very pompous attitude for someone who doesn't even know the posters on forums, as he claims we don't know his clients. It cuts both ways, but I'll venture that most posters on JBR forums know a lot more about the Ramseys than Wood knows about the posters.

It's interesting, but not surprising, that most of the recipients of Wood's e-mail have very deep pockets. I suspect most of them will avoid getting into this because they have better things to do with their time than deal with idiot lawsuits and idiot lawyers. That only serves to embolden further those idiot lawyers. The name of the game is money. Some lawyers don't care how they get it, as long as they get it.

The fact is, the Ramseys have NOT been cleared in the death of their daughter. Personally, I don't know who killed JonBenet and have never said I did know. The evidence for an intruder being in the house that night is flimsy to the point of being nearly non-existent. We've all seen promises that there is more evidence we haven't seen. I'll believe it when I see it in court. In the meantime, I don't buy anything that comes from the mouthpiece of the Ramseys - someone who is getting paid to keep them out of jail, just like their so-called investigators were doing.

In conclusion, I'll take my life anyday over Wood's life of bizarre bulldog advocacy for the Ramseys Most of us have time for an hour or two on the forum every day, if we are lucky. I'll bet he spends more time reading the forums every day than we spend posting or hanging out.

Lin Wood does not garner respect, IMFO. Whether his clients are guilty in any manner or not, his terroristic tactics have not done anything to improve their image in the eyes of the public who is watching, rather those tactics have served to alienate further those who already had doubts about the intruder theory.

__________________

The question that won't go away, why did mame, morgan, and mary99 target only FW Jr. when they knew very well that Krebs accused John Ramsey of sexually abusing her and also that she claimed someone other than FW Jr. killed JBR?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

From Forum For Justice Forum thread titled, “A warm and fuzzy message from Lin Wood” April 16, 2003

ACandyRose

Super Moderator

Registered: Nov 2001

Location: Ohio

Posts: 100

Watching You

I am seriously blown away by your post. My hat goes off to you woman !!

Now you know a person is innocent until proven guilty so let's give Mr. Wood the benefit of the doubt here. :-)

Perhaps Mr. Wood isn't aware that it was a posting on the Internet forums talking about the date of Danielle van Dam's haircut that helped put the nail in Westerfield's coffin. And that was even on a Pro-Westerfield forum. But then again that wasn't Ramsey related and maybe Mr. Wood doesn't follow other cases.

Perhaps Mr. Wood isn't aware that his own client acknowledged a web page at http://www.ramseyfamily.com/ on the Internet put there by their own investigators. Although Mr. Wood's own clients claim they don't own the web site, yet John Ramsey wrote in his book, "Death of Innocence" (DOI page 374: "We have had a Web site and tip line established since early 1997") where they listed that same web site url they claim they don't own. The web url to http://www.jameson245.com/ was also listed as reference to photos of the stun gun and garotte. Whom else did did Mr. Wood expect to be reading that web page other than people on the Internet for those "amateur detectives" to send in those tips to the tip line? Question: Did John Ramsey pay Ollie Gray who is suspected as the owner of the http://www.ramseyfamily.com/ site?

Perhaps Mr. Wood forgot that Internet forums "amateur detective" named Susan Bennett, aka Jameson, current owner of the "Jameson's WebbSleuths" forum located at http://www.jameson245.com/ met with his clients in May 1998 (estimated to be May 23, 1998) for a three hour coffee session so Ms. Bennett could expose her "amateur detective" information regarding one Donald Foster. Interesting that one week later on May 30, 1998, John Ramsey called Alex Hunter at his home with desire to cooperate.

Taking Mr. Wood's quote in his e-mail to FFJ Internet forum owner, Tricia, "Personally, I think people who immerse themselves in this case on the Internet are disturbed individuals who must not have much of a life and are to be pitied."

By Mr. Wood's standards, then this would mean that Ms. Bennett would be a "disturbed individual" who passed on "amateur detective" information to his clients in 1998 and that Mr. Wood's clients used that disturbed individual's "amateur detective" information to their benefit in an obvious goal, in my opinion, to make sure Mr. Foster's handwriting analysis of the ramsey note didn't make the Grand Jury. Reference to Mr. Wood's clients writings about Mr. Foster and Ms. Bennett can be found in their book, "Death of Innocence" (DOI page 307, 308, 309, 310, 325).

Perhaps Mr. Wood is not aware that on October 10, 1998 for ten days and again December 11, 1998 for ten more days that Internet forum "amateur detective" named Susan Bennett, aka Jameson, current owner of the "Jameson's WebbSleuths" forum located at http://www.jameson245.com/ met with the producers, Michael Tracy and David Mills so she could "share" some of her Internet "amateur detective" consulting with them that would benefit the Ramseys in the UK and A&E Documentaries and at the same time during one of those trips "amateur detective" Ms. Bennett was allowed exclusive access to the inside of Mr. Wood's clients Boulder, Colorado home.

Mr. Wood's clients even sent Ms. Bennett an e-mail on December 12, 1998 that she posted on the Internet forum located at http://www.munitrading.com/ where that e-mail was giving both Ms. Bennett and the other forum members (who by Mr. Wood's standards are "disturbed individuals and amateur detectives") a special thanks for all their support.

Perhaps Mr. Wood wasn't aware that his clients own sister, Pam Paugh participated in an exclusive Q&A session to answer questions about his clients on October 29, 1999 for the same Jameson's WebbSleuths Internet forum of "amateur detectives," the very Internet forum that his own clients advertised in their book, "Death of Innocence" specifically located at http://www.jameson245.com./ Pam Paugh did not do any Q&A on any other Internet forum.

Perhaps Mr. Wood forgot that his own clients directed readers of their book, "Death of Innocence" published March 18, 2000 to an Internet forum by not only publishing Jameson's WebbSleuths forum url in their book but specifially directing their readers to go to the forum. (DOI page 307: "That bulletin board can be found at http://www.jameson245.com/") But perhaps was okay because that forum's "amateur detective" members were Pro-Ramsey. And yet by the same standards written in the quote by Mr. Wood referenced above, his clients also directed readers of their book to an Internet forum of "disturbed individuals."

Mr. Wood also attended his client's book reception party in Atlanta, Georgia on March 18, 2000 where the owner of the "Jameson's WebbSleuths" Internet forum of "amateur detectives" Internet web url was publically printed in his clients book, "Death of Innocence" specifically located at http://www.jameson245.com/ also attended. "Amateur detective" Ms. Bennet even posted on her Internet forum on July 13, 2000 that she met Mr. Wood. (Jameson: " I met Lin and his wife when I went to Atlanta in March").

Perhaps Mr. Wood wasn't aware that Internet "amateur detective" Ms. Bennett also posted on her Internet forum under her name of "Jameson" on March 23, 2001 located at http://www.jameson245.com/ that she helped with writing Mr. Wood's clients book, "Death of Innocence." (Jameson" I was involved a bit when the book was written - met and made friends with the editor whose name is on the book - Janet Thoma.") . Based on Mr. Wood's standards then a "disturbed individual" helped with his clients own book.

Perhaps Mr. Wood forget that he, himself participated in an exclusive online Internet chat with those "amateur detectives" (and by Mr. Wood's standards, "disturbed individuals") on March 29, 2001 in #webbsleuths chat room in IRC specifically for Jameson's WebbSleuths forum, the same Internet forum of "amateur detectives" that his own clients advertised in their book, "Death of Innocence" specifically located at http://www.jameson245.com./

Mr. Wood sent threatening e-mails beginning February 26, 2000 to yet another web site owner of a "Burke did it theory" site yet that same web site url was publically printed in his own clients book, "Death of Inncence" (DOI Page 312) and by publishing said url was directing readers to go to that web site on the Internet.

And perhaps Mr. Wood was not aware that on April 24, 2000 that representitives of his clients allowed exclusive persmission for the Internet forum owner of the http://www.jameson245.com/ to not only have access to his clients former Boulder, Colorado home but to take photographs of the inside of the house and that those same photographs were published in the National Enquirer magazine in the fall of 2002 and in the National Enquirer book, "JonBenet, The Police Files" published in January 2003.

Perhaps Mr. Wood didn't completely read his clients own book, "Death of Inncence" (DOI Page 304) where the Ramseys wrote how their dear friend Susan Stine surfed the Internet forums and chat rooms DAILY. I suppose Mrs. Stine is not one of the "amateur detectives" or a "disturbed individual."

Perhaps Mr. Wood was not aware that the owner of the same Internet forum of "amateur detectives" called "Jameson's WebbSleuths" that his clients advertised in their book, "Death of Innocence" specifically located at http://www.jameson245.com/ posted on her forum on February 23, 2002 that Mr. Wood's own clients served her lunch at their private residence in Atlanta, Georgia after their "garden party" at the cemetery. Rumor has it that yet another Internet "amatuer detective" known as "Ellique" attend the "garden party" and another known as "LovelyPigeon" even telephone Patsy Ramsey that day at her home to announce that David Westerfield was arrested in the Danielle van Dam case.

Mr. Wood's clients also provided to the CBS 48 Hours (Reference Mr. Wood's 11-25-2002 e-mail to LovelyPigeon: "The Ramseys have allowed CBS, NBC and CNN to view the interrogation videotapes in their entirety") the 1997/1998 Boulder police interrogation videos where sections of those tapes were used during their October 4, 2002 show. Ms. Bennett, owner of an Internet forum also posted on her forum on October 7, 2002 that she served as a "paid consultant" for Ramsey shows. (Jameson: "I have been working as a consultant on a couple Ramsey projects - - and yes, I have been paid.") By Mr. Wood's standards then the Ramsey shows were not only using a "disturbed individual" as a consultant but they were even paying her.

But when the knowledge became evident that it was Ms. Bennett who claimed to anonymously receive the Boulder police exemplars of Mr. Wood's client and the 1997/1998 police interrogation video tape/transcript interviews of his clients and who subsequently admitted providing that information to the National Enquirer to be published in a book called, "JonBenet, The Police Files" that exposed information via Mr. Wood's e-mail was posted by "amateur detective" known as "LovelyPigeon" to the Internet forum located at http://www.jameson245.com/ who posted she was given permission from Mr. Wood to do so.

(Reference Mr. Wood's 11-25-2002 e-mail to LovelyPigeon: "I regret to inform you that I have learned this weekend that the materials and tapes utilized by the Enquirer to continue its war of false accusations for profit against the Ramsey family were sold to the Enquirer for Forty Thousand Dollars ($40,000.00) by Sue Bennett (a/k/a Jameson), an individual who maintains an Internet website about the JonBenet Ramsey case and has been perceived as a long time supporter of the Ramseys and their innocence.")

Perhaps, if Mr. Wood is going to represent his clients then he needs to do his own "amateur detective" homework and become aware that his own clients have publically supported an Internet discussion forum of "amateur detectives" evident since early 1998, long before they published that Internet forum's url at http://www.jameson245.com/ in their book, "Death of Innocence" on March 18, 2000 and Mr. Wood's clients have continued that support until November 25, 2002 (Reference Mr. Wood's 11-25-2002 e-mail to LovelyPigeon: "But I do know that John and Patsy will no longer communicate with Ms. Bennett and will not share any information with her.")

So by Mr. Wood's standards he is saying that his own clients, John and Patsy Ramsey were "sharing information" with a disturbed individual" who is nothing more than an "amateur detective." By Ms. Bennett's (amateur detective by Mr. Wood's standards) posting on the Internet, she worked as a consultant for Ramsey shows and got paid for it.

__________________

ACandyRose

http://www.acandyrose.com

http://www.jonbenetindexguide.com

Any DONATIONS to help keep the web site at www.acandyrose.com maintained and online will be most appreciated. Please use the PayPal donate button at www.acandyrose.com to make donations. A Sincere THANK YOU, ACandyRose

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

From Forum For Justice Forum thread titled, “A warm and fuzzy message from Lin Wood” April 16, 2003

ACandyRose

Super Moderator

Registered: Nov 2001

Location: Ohio

Posts: 100

quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Originally posted by "J_R"

I have to repeat Thor's Daaaymnn here ACR but then I have one comment to make.

Perhaps Mr. Wood equates all internet posters to be disturbed individuals because his only comparisons are Ms. Susan Bennett (aka Jameson) and her minions at http://www.jameson245.com./

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That could very well be true.

There is only one person on the Internet forums that I am aware of that Mr. Wood's clients and/or their associates have "shared information" with for five plus years and that would be Ms. Bennett. I bet they didn't call her a "disturbed individual" (at least to her face) in all their thank you e-mails to her over the years for "sharing information."

__________________

ACandyRose

http://www.acandyrose.com

http://www.jonbenetindexguide.com

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

From Forum For Justice Forum thread titled, “A warm and fuzzy message from Lin Wood” April 16, 2003

ACandyRose

Super Moderator

Registered: Nov 2001

Location: Ohio

Posts: 100

Tricia

Quote from Mr. Wood's April 15, 2003 e-mail:

"I never cease to be amazed at the bias of people like you against the Ramsey family"

Quote from Lou Smit on LKL 05-28-2001:

"I believe that perhaps they should get in fresh minds and fresh eyes, experienced people that can take a look at this case with an unbiased view point. That means getting rid of perhaps even the detectives that are working on it now. Getting rid of Lou Smit. Let somebody else in there that can objectively take a look at that case."

Even Lou Smit admits he is bias and suggest sombody else should be looking at the case objectively. Yet his bias "hypothisis" was allowed to be accepted by Judge Carnes as "fact."

Quote from Mr. Wood's April 15, 2003 e-mail:

"Yet, you and others elevate yourselves to the role of judge and jury even though you do not know the evidence"

Thanks to Ms. Bennett, aka Jameson whom Mr. Wood's clients "shared information" with for a suspected five plus years and the anonymous individual who sent her the 1997/1998 transcripts/video of the Ramsey interrogation interviews we know even a lot more about the evidence in this case than we knew before.

Quote from Mr. Wood's April 15, 2003 e-mail:

"Mary Keenan knows all the evidence. You can continue to fool yourself by trying to "spin" or otherwise explain her statement to your advantage, but you will fail."

Is Mr. Wood admitting that the DA's office has been "sharing information" with him and his clients whom to my knowledge are still listed as being under the umbrella of suspicion?

Quote from Mr. Wood's April 15, 2003 e-mail:

"And it is more evidence than Judge Carnes' was able to see and it is more evidence than Lou Smit has previously disclosed"

Is Mr. Wood admitting that Judge Carnes made her decision on half a-s-s information?

Quote from Mr. Wood's April 15, 2003 e-mail:

"And I am comfortable with the fact the person now in charge of the investigation is fair and objective and will follow the evidence."

Didn't DA Mary Keenan bring Lou Smit aboard recently? The same Lou Smit who stated on the LKL show 05-28-2001 the following:

Lou Smit: "I believe that perhaps they should get in fresh minds and fresh eyes, experienced people that can take a look at this case with an unbiased view point. That means getting rid of perhaps even the detectives that are working on it now. Getting rid of Lou Smit. Let somebody else in there that can objectively take a look at that case."

It doesn't sound like the "person now in charge" if being fair and objective when that person has brought aboard a person who admits he is bias.

__________________

ACandyRose

http://www.acandyrose.com

http://www.jonbenetindexguide.com

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

April 17, 2003, 11:26 am Thu Apr 17 11:26:31 BST 2003

From Forum For Justice Forum thread titled, “A warm and fuzzy message from Lin Wood” April 16, 2003

ACandyRose

Super Moderator

Registered: Nov 2001

Location: Ohio

Posts: 100

One more thing

Since I am on a roll..................

Quote from Mr. Wood's 04-15-2003 e-mail:

"You do not know them and the tragedy suffered by their family is really none of your business."

Perhaps Mr. Wood forgot that it was his clients made it our business when they went on CNN January 1, 1997 to thank the "world" for caring.

Perhaps Mr. Wood should read the inscription on JonBenet Ramsey's grave, "A gift to her family and the World."

Does this mean tips should no longer be sent in because it's none of our business?

__________________

ACandyRose

http://www.acandyrose.com

http://www.jonbenetindexguide.com

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

April 17, 2003, 12:09 pm Thu Apr 17 12:09:32 BST 2003