caylee_anthony_murder_trial

A Personal Collection of Found Materials

Caylee Marie Anthony HOMICIDE - Orlando, Florida (R.I.P. 2005-2008)
Age: 2-1/2, Caylee Anthony was reported missing by her grandmother, Cindy Anthony on July 15, 2008. At that time Caylee's mother, Casey, said on the July 15, 2008 911 call that her daughter had been missing for "31 days." Date of disappearance is unknown but the math adds up to last seen as of June 15, 2008. Caylee's body was found in a trash bag on December 11, 2008 along Suburban Drive, Orlando, Florida
Information Call: *Orange County Sheriff's Department 1-407-254-7000* or Crimeline at 1-800-423-8477

Caylee Anthony Murder Trial - June 17, 2011 (Part 2)
From Found Materials Relating To This Murder Trial
http://www.acandyrose.com/caylee_anthony_murder_trial_061711-2.htm

Return to Casey Anthony Trial Page

Caylee Anthony Case Web Pages (www.acandyrose.com)
31 Day Timeline	Front Pages	Directory Index	Transcripts	Who's Who	House Photos	Casey Photos

Friday, June 17, 2011 (Day 32 since Jury Selection - Day 21 since Trial Date)
Continued from: http://www.acandyrose.com/caylee_anthony_murder_trial_061711-1.htm

(#55) WITNESS
FOR THE DEFENSE
(Cross by State):
Dr. Tim Huntington said when he's reference decomposition elsewhere, he was refering to early stages of decomposition.

Dr. Huntington said he uses five stages of decomposition.
1) Fresh Stage
2) Bloat Stage
3) Active Decay Stage
4) Advanced Stage
5) Remains Stage.

(#56) Prosecutor Jeff Ashton asked Dr. Huntington how long he believes the body was at this other location in 95 degree temperature before it was moved to Suburban Dr location?

Defense Witness
(Cross by State):
Dr. Huntington said 2 or 3 or maybe 4 days at 95 degree temperature.

(#57) Prosecutor Jeff Ashton (questioning for the State): "So with those assumptions in mind, you would agree that the body was placed at it's finally found location within 2-3 days of death, roughly?"

Defense Witness
(Cross by State):
Dr. Tim Huntington:
"If you assume those environmental conditions."

(#58) Prosecutor Jeff Ashton (questioning for the State): "So you would agree that from that point on, this body, the evidence is consistant with this body remaining at this location from that point forward, correct?"

Defense Witness
(Cross by State):
Dr. Tim Huntington:
"If you assume that the remains were exposed to those conditions and if you assume that they did not have any intermediary conditions, were placed directly at that scene, that would be consistant."

(#59) Prosecutor Jeff Ashton (questioning for the State): "And the scene as you know it is consistant with that scenero, that the body was placed there within 2-3 days of death and remained there consistantly until it was found. There's nothing about the scene that refutes that, isn't that correct?"

Defense Witness
(Cross by State):
Dr. Tim Huntington:
"I'm hesitating because it's consistant with a lot of sceneros but yes."

(#60) Prosecutor Jeff Ashton (questioning for the State): "Right, assume as far as temperture goes, and that location would have to be such that early colonizers were unable to get to it. Would that be correct?"

Defense Witness
(Cross by State):
Dr. Tim Huntington:
"No and the reason for that is, the early colonizers, there were colonizers present on the body in very low numbers so they had some access."

(#61) Prosecutor Jeff Ashton (questioning for the State): "But clearly at some point they were not able to get to the body, is why they're not there, that's what you said, correct?"

Defense Witness
(Cross by State):
Dr. Tim Huntington:
"What I said was the insects had access to the body in early stages of decomposition, because, they were there, and then the body was moved at some point thereafter."

(#62) Prosecutor Jeff Ashton (questioning for the State): "So is what your telling us is this body had a full compliment of early colonizers on it and somebody washed it off. Is that what you're trying to tell us?"

Defense Witness
(Cross by State):
Dr. Tim Huntington:
"I did not say that"

(#63) Prosecutor Jeff Ashton (questioning for the State): "Okay, then why aren't the early colonizors there if the body was available to them, why aren't they there?"

Defense Witness
(Cross by State):
Dr. Tim Huntington:
"The flies are not at the scene, in this case, or rather the area, because, in my opinion, post mortem movement"

(#64) Prosecutor Jeff Ashton (questioning for the State): "But the insects go with the body because that's their food source, isn't it?"

Defense Witness
(Cross by State):
Dr. Tim Huntington:
"If those insects were still associated with the remains during that movement, it depends on for example, where the body was, what it may have been contained and things of that nature"

(#65) Prosecutor Jeff Ashton (questioning for the State): "So you're suggesting the body was moved in that very short window between the time the eggs are laid and the time the larve is no longer interested in the body. That it was moved in that window?"

(#66) WITNESS
FOR THE DEFENSE
(Cross by State):
Dr. Huntington said 3 possible sceneros: 1) Body moved late in feeding stages, meaning early colonizing maggots left the body only leaving a few remaining, 2) Large number of maggots were removed, such as somebody washing the body, then it was transported, 3) Large number of maggots the body is placed into the bags as it was found and then moved.

(#67) Prosecutor Jeff Ashton (questioning for the State): "Isn't there a 4th scenero though that the body in the early stages of decomposition was inexcessable to the flies. Isn't that a scenero that you forgot?"

Defense Witness
(Cross by State):
Dr. Tim Huntington:
"The body had to be excessable to the flies because there were flies present when it was recovered."

(#68) Evidence:
Defense Photo of Dr. Tim Huntington's September 2010 research study.

Prosecutor Jeff Ashton asks Dr. Huntington if it's possible that the body was moved BEFORE the large group of colonizer maggots got to it.

Defense Witness
(Cross by State):
Dr. Tim Huntington:
"Yes"

(#69) Prosecutor Jeff Ashton (questioning for the State): asked Dr. Huntington to read Dr. Neal Haskell's deposition of 01/28/11, Page 61 on what he said about the relatively small amount of colonizers.

(#70) WITNESS
FOR THE DEFENSE
(Cross by State):
Dr. Tim Huntington (reading Dr. Haskell's Depo, 01/28/11 Pg61): "The observation of reduced number of initial colonizers is consistant with the suggestion that the body was initially stored in a location that excluded the initial colonizers."

(#71) Defense Attorney Cheney Mason and Jose Baez listening to Prosecutor Jeff Ashton cross examine their defense witness Dr. Tim Huntington.

(#72) Prosecutor Jeff Ashton (questioning for the State): asked Dr. Huntington if he agreed with Dr. Hazkell's conclusion that the evidence is consistant that the body had been deposited on Surburban Drive June/July 2008?

Defense Witness
(Cross by State):
Dr. Tim Huntington said "it is consistant with those dates, yes."

(#73) Prosecutor Jeff Ashton (questioning for the State): asked Dr. Huntington if the body were kept in the early stages of decomposition isolated from the early colonizers, would that place smell, Stink?

Defense Witness
(Cross by State):
Dr. Tim Huntington said, "If it were allowed to decompose in the absense of those early colonizers, then yes."

(#74) Prosecutor Jeff Ashton (questioning for the State): asked Dr. Huntington when he examined the 1998 Pontiac Sunfire in July 2010, trunk liner removed, no garbage, it had been removed two years prior, it still smelled, correct?

Defense Witness
(Cross by State):
Dr. Tim Huntington said, "Yes, there was a smell in the trunk, yes."

(#75) WITNESS
FOR THE DEFENSE
(Cross by State):
Dr. Tim Huntington said "Knowing there was a bag of garbage found in the trunk, I could have easily associated it with garbage."

(#76) Prosecutor Ashton (questioning for the State): "When in your experience has a bag of garbage stunk up a car two years after it was removed? And what was in that garbage?"

Defense Witness
(Cross by State):
Dr. Tim Huntington: "I can honestly say I've never left a bag of garbage in a car trunk in Florida during the summer for a week."

(#77) Evidence:
Defense Photo of Dr. Tim Huntington's September 2010 research study.

Prosecutor Jeff Ashton says to Dr. Huntington "You were hired 12/11/2008, correct? When did you begin this experiment?"

Defense Witness
(Cross by State):
Dr. Tim Huntington: "September 2010"

(#78) Evidence:
Defense Photo of Dr. Tim Huntington's September 2010 research study.

Prosecutor Jeff Ashton asks, "This experiment was created specifically for this case, isn't that correct?

Defense Witness
(Cross by State):
Dr. Huntington, "No Sir, it was not." (But he did tell defense that he was doing an experiment.)

(#79) WITNESS
FOR THE DEFENSE
(Cross by State):
Dr. Tim Huntington admitted he never before worked on a case with the body in the trunk of a car prior to his September 2010 Pigs in the trunk experiment.

(#80) Prosecutor Ashton (questioning for the State): ask Dr. Huntington how many experiments he knows of involving small children? In trunks? "How many small children wrapped in blankets?" "How many wrapped in blankets stuff in garbage bags?"

Defense Witness
(Cross by State):
Dr. Tim Huntington: "I'm not aware of any that specified a small child."

(#81) Prosecutor Ashton (questioning for the State): "So we can assume none of your studies were on a small child or a child wrapped in a blanket and stuffed into two garbage bags?"

Defense Witness
(Cross by State):
Dr. Tim Huntington:
"I think that's a fair assumption, yes."

(Ashton then asked Huntington why he didn't wrap his pigs in a blanket?)

(#82) Prosecutor Jeff Ashton (questioning for the State): "But you would agree that this is not a fair representation of what Caylee's body, or what a trunk would have looked like with Caylee's body in it because she was wrapped in a blanket, two bags and a laundry bag!"

Defense Witness
(Cross by State):
Dr. Tim Huntington:
"If you're looking at the final product of decomposition, that would be correct."

(#83) Prosecutor Jeff Ashton (questioning for the State): "Did you ever experiment with the effects of Chloroform on attracting flies?"

Defense Witness
(Cross by State):
Dr. Tim Huntington:
"No Sir"

(#84) Prosecutor Jeff Ashton (questioning for the State): "Did you, in your experiment, put Chloroform in with the pigs to see how that effected the early colonizers?"

Defense Witness
(Cross by State):
Dr. Tim Huntington:
""No Sir, I did not."

(#85) Prosecutor Jeff Ashton (questioning for the State): "You are aware that chemical testing of the carpet and trunk air indicated levels of Chloroform, correct?"

Defense Witness
(Cross by State):
Dr. Tim Huntington:
"Yes"

(#86) Prosecutor Jeff Ashton: "Hypothetical, lets say the individual is placed in the trunk alive and dies in the trunk, there's large amounts of Chloroform on the body or in the air. What effect would that have on early colonizers."

Defense Witness
(Cross by State):
Dr. Tim Huntington:
"Because there's been no research on that specific topic, I don't know there's a good answer for that."

(#87) Prosecutor Jeff Ashton: "The paper towels that were found in the garbage, what was on those paper towels, Dr. Huntington. Do you know?"

Defense Witness
(Cross by State):
Dr. Tim Huntington:
"I don't"

(#88) WITNESS
FOR THE DEFENSE
(Cross by State):
Dr. Tim Huntington reading from his report quoting Dr. Arpad Vass' report (Pg7). "Fatty acids such as the one detected, palmitic, stearic, mystic, allite indicates a fat decomposition product like Adipocere or grave wax present on the paper towels."

(#89) Prosecutor Ashton asks Dr. Huntington if he had any reason to dispute Dr. Arpad Vass report that he was referencing in his own report regarding the paper towels?

Defense Witness
(Cross by State):
Dr. Tim Huntington: "No, I assume that's correct"

(#90) Prosecutor Ashton asks Dr. Huntington if Adipocere would attract the Megaselia scalaris (coffin fly)?

Defense Witness
(Cross by State):
Dr. Tim Huntington:
"Yes, they would be."

(#91) Evidence: Photo of trash found in garbage bag from trunk of 1998 Pontiac Sunfire

(#92) Evidence: Photo of trash found in garbage bag from trunk of 1998 Pontiac Sunfire

(#93) Evidence: Photo of trash found in garbage bag from trunk of 1998 Pontiac Sunfire

(#94) Prosecutor Jeff Ashton opening evidence boxes in the court room to located the various physical items from the garage bags removed from the 1998 Pontiac Sunfire.

(#95) Defense Attorney Jose Baez objects stating he thinks it's better for prosecution to use the photographs citing the actually items of evidence might not be in the same condition as when the photographs were taken. Judge Perry: Objection overruled.

(#96) Evidence: Beverage can from evidence in trash bag found in 1998 Pontiac Sunfire, removed from evidence envelope by Prosecutor Jeff Ashton to show Dr. Tim Huntington on the witness stand.

(#97) Evidence: Beverage can from evidence in trash bag found in 1998 Pontiac Sunfire, removed from evidence envelope by Prosecutor Jeff Ashton to show Dr. Tim Huntington on the witness stand.

(#98) Prosecutor Jeff Ashton shows the inventory report for the contents of the items in the trash bag to Dr. Tim Huntington. Report shows ALL cans in the trash bag were empty, no "tobacco spit" inside cans.

(#99) Prosecutor Jeff Ashton shows Dr. Tim Huntington the physical empty package of lunch meat found in the trash bag that was in the 1998 Pontiac Sunfire trunk to verify there is no meat inside the package.

(#100) Evidence: Empty Lunch Meat Package from evidence in trash bag found in 1998 Pontiac Sunfire, removed from evidence envelope by Prosecutor Jeff Ashton to show Dr. Tim Huntington on the witness stand. The only thing inside the lunch meat package was a piece of paper.

(#101) Prosecutor Jeff Ashton asks Dr. Tim Huntington if it appears that there is no food in the trash bag that was in the 1998 Pontiac Sunfire.

Defense Witness
(Cross by State):
Dr. Tim Huntington: "There appears to be no food in the trash."

(#102) Prosecutor Jeff Ashton asks Dr. Tim Huntington if one could take a paper towel and clean up decomp fluid, small amount that might be on the surface?

Defense Witness
(Cross by State):
Dr. Tim Huntington:
"I don't think it would be effective but you certainly could try."

(#103) Prosecutor Jeff Ashton says the only thing you can't get rid of is the smell, correct?

Defense Witness
(Cross by State):
Dr. Tim Huntington: "I think the 'I can't get rid of' is an over expession"

(#104) Prosecutor Jeff Ashton asks, what was the average temperature for the 10 days the pig was in the trunk?

Defense Witness
(Cross by State):
Dr. Tim Huntington: "Approximently 60 degree Fahrenheith"

(#105) Prosecutor Jeff Ashton says, so 10 days at 60 degree would compare to how many days at 90 degrees? Six days?

Defense Witness
(Cross by State):
Dr. Tim Huntington: "Sounds about right."

(#106) Prosecutor Jeff Ashton done with cross examination of Defense witness
Dr. Tim Huntington

(#107) Defense Jose Baez: "Dr. Huntington, you don't disagree with Dr. Haskell's findings as it relates to Suburban Drive, do you?"

Defense Witness:
(Redirect by Baez)
Dr. Tim Huntington: "No, his report on the site of recovery, it's very much agreeable."

(#108) WITNESS
FOR DEFENSE:
Dr. Tim Huntington: "I think the evidence in this case recovered from the site of recovery really does speak for itself. The body was there for some period of time, it's very difficult to say exactly how long it was there. Months is a good answer. The evidence at the scene suggests the body was moved, after death at some period, from some location. So that's very agreeable."

(#109) Defense Jose Baez: "And that's after some stage of decomposition has already passed, correct?"

Defense Witness:
(Redirect by Baez)
Dr. Tim Huntington: "That makes perfect sense looking at the evidence, yes"

(#110) Defense Jose Baez: "Can you look at Dr. Haskell's report and see how many were there, of insects, of early colonizers were present?"

Defense Witness:
(Redirect by Baez)
Dr. Tim Huntington: "Tallying them up, there were 75 papea recovered from the bag (laundry bag)" "That is very few when you consider a single female fly can lay upwards of 300."

The www.acandyrose.com web site is an privately owned archive site collection of found materials and organized timelines on missing and/or cold cases created for educational purposes. All personal collection of found materials have been accessed from public domains and/or quotes following the rules under the "fair use rule of copyright law." - This web site is non-profit although personal donations to help cover server costs are welcome via the PayPal donation button on the home page here
Home Page	First Amendment	ACandyRose© since 1998		webmaster e-mail	Disclaimer