s-evidence-gloves.htm


	A Personal view of the Internet Subculture Surrounding the JonBenet Ramsey Murder case

This web page is part of a series covering found materials regarding individuals, items or events that apparently became part of what is commonly known as the vortex of the JonBenet Ramsey murder case Christmas night 1996. The webmaster of this site claims no inside official Boulder police information as to who has been interviewed, investigated, the outcome or what information is actually considered official evidence. These pages outline found material which can include but not limited to materials found in books, articles, the Internet, transcripts, depositions, legal documents, Internet discussion forums, graphics or photos, media reports, TV/Radio shows about the JonBenet Ramsey murder case. Found materials are here for historical archive purposes. (www.acandyrose.com - acandyrose@aol.com)

This webpage series is for historical archive and educational purposes on found materials


Evidence - Gloves Suspected Evidence found at the crime scene

CHAIN OF EVENTS 2000

2000-08-28: Patsy Ramsey Interview - Atlanta, Georgia - August 28, 2000 (Screen Capture on left is from "CBS 48 Hours Investigates - Searching for a Killer" 10/04/2002)

Patsy Ramsey Interview - Atlanta, Georgia - August 28, 2000
Interviewed by: Michael Kane, Bruce Levine, Mitch Morrissey,
Mark Beckner, Tom Wickman, Tom Trujillo and Jane Harmer

Ramsey Representatives Present:
Lin Wood, Ollie Gray, and John San Augustine

http://www.jonbenetindexguide.com/2000ATL-Patsy-Interview-Complete.htm

August 2000 Patsy Ramsey Atlanta Interview
(Gloves and Gardening)

.

CHAIN OF EVENTS 2002

2002-01-25: Webbsleuths Forum (http://www.webbsleuths.com)
"Patsy's gloves"

"Patsy's gloves"
Posted by jameson on Jan-25-02 at 06:07 PM (EST)

The grand jury witnesses are free to speak to anyone they want about what happened in the grand jury room. I understand some of the grand jurors have expressed a desire to have the same freedom. We all know that the authorities involved have sometimes shared with others.... and maybe it is time a bit was made public.

Questions asked in the grand jury room included some about gardening gloves that might have been worn by Patsy when she worked in the yard. Witnesses were asked about Patsy's "navy and lavender gloves." But witnesses didn't remember her owning any gardening gloves, they remembered she didn't mind getting her hands dirty - gardening, painting, whatever, Patsy was not terribly fussy on that.

The gloves seemed important to the prosecution - they acted like the gloves were an established fact. But I don't see them in any evidence list, never read about them in any book.

I think the point was he was trying to get someone to say Patsy wore gloves - - that there should have been SOME in the house- - but I don't see where any were found.

Maybe someone has other ideas on this?

1 . "Jameson"
Posted by why_nut on Jan-25-02 at 06:15 PM (EST)

"The grand jury witnesses are free to speak to anyone they want about what happened in the grand jury room. I understand some of the grand jurors have expressed a desire to have the same freedom. We all know that the authorities involved have sometimes shared with others.... and maybe it is time a bit was made public."
..................................................................................................
What you are discussing is a leak. You are giving out official information while you are not an official authorized to give it out. So who told you this story? You want to identify leaks and where they came from; you can lead by example.

CLICK HERE: Flight 755 15th Street Main Directory

Home

1998 to 2007 ACandyRose�

E-Mail