[ACandyRose Logo] A Personal view of the Internet Subculture
Surrounding the JonBenet Ramsey Murder case

[IMAGE] [IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
This web page is part of a series covering found materials regarding individuals, items or events that apparently became part of what is commonly known as the vortex of the JonBenet Ramsey murder case Christmas night 1996. The webmaster of this site claims no inside official Boulder police information as to who has been interviewed, investigated, the outcome or what information is actually considered official evidence. These pages outline found material which can include but not limited to materials found in books, articles, the Internet, transcripts, depositions, legal documents, Internet discussion forums, graphics or photos, media reports, TV/Radio shows about the JonBenet Ramsey murder case. Found materials are here for historical archive purposes. (www.acandyrose.com - acandyrose@aol.com)
This webpage series is for historical archive and educational purposes on found materials


[Sketchman]
Sketchman
04-27-1998 drawing

Sketchman

Created By Dorothy Allison
On The Leeza Gibbons Show
April 27, 1998
"Tracking JonBenet's Killer"
[Dorothy Allison]
Dorothy Allison
Psychic
b1925 - d1999


August 6, 1995: Colorado Springs Gazette - Tracking Heather's KILLER:

In 1992, Dorothy Allison, a noted New Jersey psychic who has worked with police across the country, called the Friends of Heather Dawn Church Foundation."

`I can tell you the killer's name right now,' "Allison remembered saying. " `His name is Brown.'"But not like the color brown; not spelled that way.

No one is quite sure how the tip was pursued. The name was probably compared with those of everyone connected with the case, Smit said. Then it was forgotten.

"No one got religion. But in November, El Paso County got a new sheriff, John Anderson, a former Colorado Springs police sergeant. Anderson soon hired an old partner, Lou Smit, as head of investigations. Smit, who has a knack for solving old homicide cases, made Heather a top priority again.

Shortly after starting work last January, Smit reviewed Heather's file, a process he calls "messing with a case." He asked his investigators to come up with something new, something that hadn't been tried.

Tom Carney, a crime laboratory technician, immediately thought of the prints. "We knew those fingerprints had to be from the suspect," he said.

A better approach, he figured, would be an exhaustive mailing of quality photos of the prints to every police agency with an Automated Fingerprint Identification System. Like the FBI's system, AFIS compares fingerprint images electronically. AFIS computers aren't interconnected, but each one may contain prints that aren't in the hands of the FBI.

So Carney made 100 sets of photos of the three fingerprints and began sending them to 92 agencies with AFIS. Carney remembered thinking, "If this doesn't work, that's it.

On March 24, someone from the Louisiana prison system called to report a match between the prints from the Church home and prints in its data base. The prints belonged to Robert Charles Browne. He had spent time in Louisiana prisons for various crimes, including auto theft, in the early and mid-1980s. He moved to Colorado in 1987 and, after living at several addresses, settled into a home just down the road from the Church residence.

"Considering all the publicity, detectives figured they'd hear from psychics. Some detectives scoff at psychics; others are skeptical but willing to listen.

"I'm not going to disregard them," said Capt. Lou Smit, now head of investigations for the Sheriff's Office. "Sometimes, psychics come up with things you can't explain. And sometimes they come up with things almost too hard to believe."




April 27, 1998: Dorothy Allison descibed JonBenet's killer on the Leeza Gibbon's Show:

"He's probably 5'7" to 5'9". He's got thin, brown hair that he wears over to the side, perhaps a little bit balding underneath. He has a very wide cranium on top and a real small chin, very thin lips and a pointed nose, very light eyes -- kind of Germanic descent, and a very slender build throughout the body, a little bit wide through the hips, high pitched voice and soft spoken."



June 3, 2000: Sketchman appeared on Ramsey website (www.ramseyfamily.com)

Ramsey message read: "Have you seen this man? This man may have been in the Boulder area in December 1996. ... We firmly believe that this most horrible of killers will be caught based on information provided by people who care about right and wrong. ... Please help, so another innocent child will not be a victim and another family will not suffer unbearable grief."



July 19, 2000 Scott Ross (The 700 Club) interviews John and Patsy Ramsey re: Sketchman

JOHN: Our investigators control the web site. They put that picture on there. We did not contact a psychic as has been reported. The sketch that appeared on the web site that our investigators use was provided by Dorthy Allison on a television program a year or so ago. Our objective is to keep this alive in the public's mind, in hopes that the one lead that we are waiting for will come through.

SCOTT: So you allowed it to be used?

JOHN: We don't control the web site. The information that was put on there was put on there by our investigators, what they think is appropriate.




August 7, 2000: Cybersleuths Forum: SketchMan Disappears From Ramsey Web Site!!!!!!!

Adam postings: "At the time of the 700 Club interview last month, "SketchMan" was prominently displayed on the Ramsey Family web site.

The 700 Club interviewer took a huge hard swing at the Ramseys having this "demonic" drawing at their Web site.

John then replied he has "no control over the content" of his OWN FAMILY's Web site.

I checked their Web site immediately after the 700 Club broadcast and it was still there; checked it yesterday & IT WAS GONE!!"




August 29, 2000 Atlanta Interview Dorothy Allison information in 50page file of leads

During the Atlanta meeting, the Ramseys and their investigators turned over a 50 page file of leads, tips and suspects that included information apparently developed by Dorothy Allison during her April 27, 1998 appearance on the Leeza Show. In this 50 page file it is stated that there are letters from people who have sent information based on what they heard on the television program.



August 17, 2006: Interview for the www.thedenverchannel.com, Dorothy's husband Bob:

"She said that the killer crawled in through the cellar, went in through the window, upstairs and grabbed Jon Benet and that's all she would say to me," said Bob.

Bob read from one of Allison's notes: "'This man went unnoticed in the house. The Ramsey's are not responsible for the death of the child. This is my true and honest belief.' She had written this March 21, 1998 at 8:20am."



RECAP OF INFORMATION PROVIDED BY DOROTHY ALLISON April 27, 1998:

01. JonBenet was already dead by 11:25 PM on Dec. 25, 1996
02. Dorothy said the killer was hiding in a closet
03. Dorothy said JonBenet's little shiny yellow raincoat was also in that closet
04. There could be a "thumb print" on the shiny yellow raincoat.
05. She said the killer always played hide and seek with JonBenet by hiding in the closet.
06. She said JonBenet woke up to go to the bathroom, killer grabbed her in the bathroom
07. She said the killer dragged JonBenet to a washroom where there were dirty clothes.
08. She died from strangulation, that was the main cause of death.
09. JonBenet trusted him. She felt that it was okay to be friendly with this man
10. She said the killer was a worker in the house, "like a janitor"
11. He killed JonBenet because she recognized him
12. He didn't plan to kill her but things got out of control
13. After he killd JonBenet he "then he dragged her down some stairs"
14. Dorothy: "I believe this is how the man always came through the house, through the back door"
15. She said "I get the name Irving or Irvin", "I think he's the one who murdered this child"
16. There's a connection to killer with Germany - "whether he's of German descent, I don't know"
17. Dorothy said, "And also something with Georgia. I keep getting Georgia"
18. Dorothy said, "I see the numbers 289 or could be 928, could be reversed either way"
19. And there's some connection to a Martin, "that name comes very strong in my mind"
20. The killer fixed a leak in the bathroom about a few weeks before she was murdered
21. She gave info to BDA's office, to same man who worked the Heather Dawn Church case
22. She felt JonBenet's presence strongest near the window grate


OTHER INFORMATION:

01. Allison assisted El Paso County investigators in the Heather Dawn Church case in 1992
02. One of the flyers distributed by Ramseys contained the sketch given by Allison
03. Sketchman appeared on the Ramsey website in June 2000

CHAIN OF EVENTS 1998


[jameson's Webbsleuths]1998-04-27: Dorothy Allison created "Sketchman" on the Leeza Gibbons Show

The LEEZA Gibbons Show - April 27, 1998
"Dorothy Allison: Tracking JonBenet's Killer."


On www.webbsleuths.com, thread titled, "Dorothy Allison"

2 . "Allison on LEEZA"
Posted by jameson on Oct-26-01 at 07:01 PM (EST)

LEEZA: You spent some time at JonBenet's house.

Dorothy Allison: Yes.

LEEZA: Where you actually got lots of strong images and feelings about what it was like in JonBenet's final hours. I want to begin our story there.


Dorothy at house...

Dorothy: Now that I am so close to JonBenet's house and where this murder took place, I absolutely believe the name of the man I will be giving you did this murder. She was already dead by 11:25 PM on Dec. 25, 1996, She was already dead. I feel that the perpetrator actually was through with her. I feel that. I feel that he goes in through the back door when he comes to this house. And there is a closet and in that closet is JonBenet's little yellow raincoat, a little shiny raincoat. He was hiding in there. He used to always do that. It was a game he had played with her. I feel she was in bed and had to go to the bathroom. That's where it all started. This is where he grabbed her, in the bathroom. Then I get - the next scene I get - is a washroom where they had dirty clothes and stuff. He seems to drag her into that area. This is where he goes to attack her and that's why he covers her mouth so she doesn't holler so loud.

I believe there's no way they could have heard anything, especially if you're choking her, you're smothering her, you're taping her mouth. How could the mother and father hear anything? Look how far up they were. They were on the top floor. When she got too squeamish and too upset, this is when he decided he had to kill her. She died from strangulation. I've heard them say something about her head being hit. I feel the strangulation was the main cause of death.

This is where I feel the strongest feeling of JonBenet more than any other place in this house. Now, I don't know this house, but when I stand here I feel her presence more than ever, right down here. (near the grate) And this is where I feel this killer so strongly it's unbelievable the feelings I have. I feel that he's right here in my presence. That's how strongly he comes through -- him and the little girl. She trusted him. She felt that it was okay to be friendly with this man. But she knew her killer and I believe that it was the man that I named.


Dorothy in studio with LEEZA

LEEZA: You said she knew him.

Dorothy: Yes, he worked in the house.

LEEZA: He worked there. Did he plan to kill JonBenét?

Dorothy: He didn't plan to kill her. He played with her. He'd go in the closet and play hide and seek. He'd play little games with her and a child that age doesn't know danger. He'd play with her so she didn't look at him as a threat.

LEEZA: So if he didn't plan to kill her, what -- did he just get out of control?

Dorothy: No. Because she started to scream and holler when he did go to grab her -- then she realized that he's rather rough -- and he choked her and strangled her, then he dragged her down some stairs.

LEEZA: she was sexually assaulted.

Dorothy: He did it.

LEEZA: He did it. Had he done that before?

Dorothy: I feel that he'd always played around with her, but this time he wanted to attack her, almost like a rape, and this is why he had to kill her, because she recognized him and she recognized the wrong.

LEEZA: And there's no way you believe the parents were involved?

Dorothy: Absolutely not.

Dorothy: I get the name Irving or Irvin and they will know who it is. They will know the name as soon as they hear it. I now what his face looks like. I could describe it for a composite if I had to.


(By the back doors to the hall and spiral stairs...)

Dorothy: I believe this is how the man always came through the house -- through the back door -- I don't get him coming through the other door -- I get these two doors as being very important to this killer.

Dorothy: There's some connection to this killer with Germany -- whether he's of German descent, I don't know. And also something with Georgia. I keep getting Georgia. I see the numbers 289 or could be 928, could be reversed either or either way. Whether this is an address or a phone number, I don't know just yet, but I know there's a connection to those numbers. And there's some connection to a Martin -- that name comes very strong in my mind. But that Irving -- I think he's the one that did this. I think he's the one who murdered this child.


(Back in the studio)

LEEZA: Dorothy, it's eerie for me to hear you come up with a name and have such a visual description when the police have come up with nothing.

Dorothy: They never did, not ever from the beginning. if you remember back. I mean, they didn't even secure the murder scene. So where are we with the police there?

LEEZA: Now clearly we can't prove or disprove anything that Dorothy's saying. We don't know if this guy even exists and, if he does, if he had anything to do with JonBenét's death. But you say that the person that you get a feeling of was a handyman who worked in the house.

Dorothy: Yes, like a janitor. He used to do thing around the house. In fact he fixed a leak for them in the bathroom about, I'd say, a few weeks before she was murdered.

LEEZA: Did he write the ransom note?

Dorothy: Absolutely. He knew exactly what he was doing. And it was festivities that day, it was December 25 so everybody's having fun and no one suspects anything. The problem with the parents, I think, they were much too liberal. If they're guilty of anything, they're guilty of trusting.

(Dorothy said that JonBenét loved being at school - that she loved the other kids, the swings. She said that JonBenét was a normal, HAPPY little girl, no different from any other child.)

LEEZA: How about the police? Is there any physical evidence to connect this man to the murder?

Dorothy: I feel that if it were me, I would find out where this little yellow raincoat was hanging because it's the kind of material where the murderer leaves a thumb print. There's a trunk in that closet where little JonBenet's clothing was -- now someone has to know. This may be the prosecutor's office. They have everything I've given you today.

LEEZA: How certain are you, Dorothy, about the information you've given Jeannie to sketch?

Dorothy: Well, I gave it to the prosecution's office, so I believe I'm quite on with it. I believe every bit of what I have said here.

LEEZA: And you are working with the DA?

Dorothy: Yes. There's a policeman there - we worked on a murder case in 1995, and I gave him the name of the killer, and he did eventually get that killer. And so he knows my work. He knows that I am very serious and that I would never say anything about anyone unless I was 99% sure. I mean, I can see this man's face constantly(?). I thought about it from day one when I first heard about the case.


She described the killer -

"He's probably 5'7" to 5'9". He's got thin, brown hair that he wears over to the side, perhaps a little bit balding underneath. He has a very wide cranium on top and a real small chin, very thin lips and a pointed nose, very light eyes -- kind of Germanic descent, and a very slender build throughout the body, a little bit wide through the hips, high pitched voice and soft spoken."


1998-04-00: Psychic Sleuth Dorothy Allison & The Jonbenet Ramsey Murder

http://www.cicap.org/en_artic/at101007.htm
Psychic Sleuth Dorothy Allison & The Jonbenet Ramsey Murder
by Steve Allen and Joe Nickell

Author/Entertainer Steve Allen and Leading Paranormal Investigator Joe Nickell Question Validity of Psychic Detective Work

AMHERST, NY -- Self-claimed "police psychic" Dorothy Allison is trying to insinuate herself into yet another high-profile murder case, that of child beauty princess JonBenet Ramsey, whose tiny body was bludgeoned and strangled in her parents' Boulder, Colorado, home on Christmas night 1996.

The Nutley, New Jersey, great-grandmother was featured on the April 27 airing of LEEZA (The Leeza Gibbons Show), a program titled "Dorothy Allison: Tracking JonBenet's Killer." Allison insisted that the little girl's parents were "absolutely not" involved, and that the real killer was a former handyman. She perceived "connections" to Germany and Georgia, the numbers 2-8-9, and the names "Martin" and "Irving" -- the latter, she said, being "the one I think that did this" (the murder). Working with a police artist, Allison produced a drawing of the alleged killer.

Leeza emphasized that Allison had gone far out on the proverbial limb, and some audience members seemed quite skeptical of the clairvoyant's "clues." One woman challenged Allison to tell where the alleged murderer was, as Leeza tactfully took the opportunity to go to a commercial break.

Psychics thrive on the media attention they can get from high-profile cases. According to celebrated author and entertainer Steve Allen, co-chair of the Council for Media Integrity: "The important question, in cases of this sort, is to determine whether a) the alleged psychic is a barefaced liar or b) honestly self-deluded, in the way that many religious fanatics are. In the meantime television producers must be urged to consult scientists and other authorities who are perfectly aware of the essential absurdity of claims made by psychics, fortunetellers, tarot-card readers, or astrologers. It is relevant to quote here a little quatrain I wrote years ago in an album for children titled 'How to Think': Look for the evidence. Look for the proof. Or else you're acting like an awful goof."

Although Allison was billed as a "police psychic who helped solve 5,000 cases," the truth is quite different. A look at some of her prior "successes" is revealing.

For example, in various media venues Allison is touted as having located a missing child's body in 1967. According to an episode of TV's Crackdown on Crime (1997), "Nutley Police asked her to find a missing five-year-old boy. She did. He had drowned in a pipe during a storm."

The fact is, there is no proof that Dorothy Allison - or anyone -- has ever psychically located a body or solved a crime.


[www.justicewatch.com]1998-12-15: Justice Watch Forum thread, "Psychic's handyman/child killer?"

"Psychic's handyman/child killer?"
Posted by Imbackon on 10:12:56 12/15/98
Include Original Message on Reply

Since there is really not much news, I thought I would take it upon myself to post a thread today. Remember on Leeza, Dorothy Allison I believe claimed a handyman (one that was sketched) named Irving or something killed Jonbenet?

Well she must have had her wires crossed, cause Cybersleuths has an article about Michelle Dorr (6 years old)that was murdered that sure fits the bill.

"Handyman's Murder Trial Set

Hadden Irving Clark, the Silver Spring handyman accused of killing 6-year-old Michele Dorr in 1986 and hiding her body, is set to go to trial April 26..." Your comments welcome. Imbackon



2. "G2" Posted by Ruthee on 11:53:42 12/15/98
Include Original Message on Reply

This thread is going to be boring to some and amusing to others. I hesitate to post, but if it is boring it will sink to the bottom and take it's place in the arcives.

You're not going to find an intuitive person who can prevent murdres. What if an intuitive person says they prevented a murder and gives circumstances that lead you to believe that a murder may have been committed. The thing that you know is the person has not been murdered. The circumstance that you don't know and will never know is would the person have been murdered without the intuitive information. There is no way to know.

You may have a case where an intuitive person tells someone, "Don't get on that plane, it's going to crash." If the person doesn't get on the plane and it does crash, you may want to take a serious look at what appears to prevented one "death".

I'd like to go over some things in connection with this case that came to me through some means that I have no way of explaining.

I "saw" a black sleeping mask connected to this case before there was any way that I could have known that a black sleeping mask was removed from the Ramsey home in connection with a search warrant. What does the mask have to do with the case? I have no idea. Does it mean anything as far as solving this murder? Probably not. I don't have the luxury of picking and choosing intuitive information. Could it have been a fluke? Yes.

I "saw" a "valentine" on the body before I had any way of knowing that a heart was drawn on JBR. Does this have something to do with the case? Yes. Do I have any idea of how it got there or exactly how or with what the valentine was placed on the body? No. Did I know where on the body the heart was located" No. Could it have been a fluke? Yes.

I "saw" bubbles at the mouth of JBR and vomit when I had no way of knowing how the body would be presented to the coroner. Did I know what that meant or that there would be "brown dried body fluid on her face? No. Did I know that Patsy Ramsey would mention almost two years later that she vomited the morning of the murder? No. Could it be a fluke? Yes.

I saw a black iron gate...yes gate. (That's when I went to the FBI) Did I know what it meant? No. Did I know that a black iron grate...grate...would be very important in this case? No. Could it have been a fluke? Yes.

Do I remember the intuitive thoughts that tend to be significant and tend to forget thoughts that have not come into fruitation? Yes.

Somethimes intuitive thoughts are forgotten until something pops into the case that leads me to believe that I had a correct thought but dismissed it as in the case of the iron grate.

There are other thoughts that are probably wrong, and some that may come to be shown to be connected. I won't know until something shows up that seems to indicate that the thought was connected.

If anyone is interested in past impressions that I have yet to connect and may be completely wrong, I'll be happy to post them. I am not afraid to be wrong...I'm wrong much of the time. I can do what I can do...If it's connected, those that know the inside circumstances of the case will know. I don't want them to tell me if I'm right or wrong, the less I know, the easier it is.

So it comes down to the fact that some people believe that intuitive people can contribute to police cases (I don't mean solve them) and some people are not interested. So be it.



3. "Ruthee"
Posted by Chris on 12:12:32 12/15/98
Include Original Message on Reply

I remember one night in chat, you were talking about flowers, you mentioned a picture of a flower (I think). You tied them to the stairway JBR was carried down. I was shocked to see the wallpaper in the hallway right by the basement stairs - covered with boquets of flowers.

I'd love to see the list. It will give us some new material to use to pick on you



7. "G2" Posted by Ruthee on 12:52:14 12/15/98
Include Original Message on Reply

We seem to be talking about two different things, but I agree with your statement.

I have been to see a psychic once. I saw Sylvia Brown when she was located in Navato CA. I don't know where she is now.

We had a nice conversation. That was over 25 years ago. I would like to meet Dorothy Allison. I think she has a problem of going too far with self interpretation of her impressions. I personally believe it's better to let the people who "know what's going on" to interpret intuitive impressions. Just my impression. If she has success with the way she uses her intuition, then naturally that's the best for her.



12. "Reply to Imbackon"
Posted by Perplexed on 14:55:57 12/15/98
Include Original Message on Reply

Dorothy Allison had an artist make a sketch of her suspect. Does Hadden Irving Clark look like that sketch? Dorothy also said her guy had a mild speaking voice slightly high pitched. She said he had blue eyes and and had a light complexion. She said he had a wide forehead and a narrow chin. She said the name could be Irvin or Irving. Maybe the poster that lives near the area where Michelle Dorr was murdered saw a picture of Clark and could draw a comparison. Dorothy`s guy also had thinning hair that was combed across to hide a thin or balding spot. The Ramseys had a handyman who lived with the housekeeper. His name was Irvin or mervin. I saw one picture of him and he had a beard so you couldn`t tell anything.



17. "...Ruthee..."
Posted by jonesy on 19:13:04 12/15/98
Include Original Message on Reply

on a talk show, syvia browne said "the whole family is involved" concerning the JonBenet case - that is all she would say -



[Hadden Irving Clark - Picture from www.washingtonpost.com]18. "Pic of Hadden Irving"
Posted by Imbackon on 20:12:16 12/15/98
Include Original Message on Reply

There is text and a pic at this page, so I don't think there is a way for me to just post his picture.

Here is the url:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/local/longterm/library/dorr/dorr2.htm

His hair is thinning and he has a thin face.

Looks like he has thin lips too, but it is hard to tell because he looks to be foaming at the mouth in this pic!

Also thanks for listing your impressions Ruthie.
Imbackon

CHAIN OF EVENTS 1999


[jameson's Webbsleuths]1999-11-01: Webbsleuths Forum (http://www.webbsleuths.com)
"Merv, the handyman"


32 . "Allison is full of bull"
Posted by MaskedMan on Nov-01-99 at 09:47 PM (EST)

L.P.,
Dorothy Allison made various claims about the handyman/killer. She said that he played with JonBenet. Merv never even met or saw JonBenet. Allison also claimed that the killer has a German accent. Merv is an American with no accent. And so on.

In fact, at the Ramsey house, there was no handyman who fit Dorothy Allison's description. I think her ESP stands for "error some place."


[Dorothy Allison's description of the killer]
1999-12-01: Psychic Detective' Dorothy Allison Dies

Psychic Detective' Dorothy Allison Dies
Nutley, New Jersey - December 1. 1999
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2843/is_2_24/ai_60302601

'Psychic Detective' Dorothy Allison Dies - Brief Article - Obituary

Dorothy Allison--who gained fame, or infamy, as a self-proclaimed psychic sleuth--died on December 1, 1999, at age 74.

Although she convinced many reporters and even police that she had a criminological sixth sense, skeptics observed that the Nutley, New Jersey, great-grandmother propelled herself into prominence by a tried-and-true formula: arrive on the scene of high-profile cases, make numerous vague pronouncements and, after the true facts become known, interpret the statements accordingly--a technique known as "retrofitting."

For example, a 1997 episode of TV's Crackdown on Crime said of Allison: "Nutley police asked her to find a missing five-year-old boy. She did. He had drowned in a pipe during a storm." In fact, however, every one of those statements is untrue. It was Allison who approached police with a "vision." Not only did she fail to locate the child's body, but she caused police to waste considerable resources in digging up a drainage pipe she had identified. The boy's body was actually discovered later, floating in a pond, by a man seeking a spot to bury his dead cat. But through the technique of retrofitting, Allison converted her failure into a seeming success, mentioning details of the boy's clothing that she had supposedly "seen" accurately.

In her obituary, The New York Times observed that Allison was unsuccessful in solving the Patty Hearst kidnapping, the "Son of Sam" killings, the Atlanta child murders, or the death of JonBenet Ramsey--all cases in which Allison insinuated herself. "Skeptics," noted the Times, "many armed with volumes of research, insist that psychics never solved a single crime." That was certainly true of Allison who nevertheless made a name for herself by convincing people otherwise.

CHAIN OF EVENTS 2000


[Dorothy Allison's description of the killer]
2000-06-03: Sketchman appeared on the Ramsey web site at www.ramseyfamily.com

"Have you seen this man?"

"This man may have been in the Boulder area in December 1996. ... We firmly believe that this most horrible of killers will be caught based on information provided by people who care about right and wrong. ... Please help, so another innocent child will not be a victim and another family will not suffer unbearable grief."


2000-06-03: Ramseys Post Suspect Sketch Online

Ramseys Post Suspect Sketch Online - June 3, 2000
Likeness Based On Work Of Psychic, Dorothy Allison
http://html.thedenverchannel.com/sh/news/stories/nat-news-20000603-195421.html

BOULDER, Colo.,
Molly Thompson, Staff Writer,
Posted 3:54 p.m. EDT June 3, 2000

John and Patsy Ramsey have posted a psychic's composite sketch of a suspect in their daughter's murder on their Internet site (http://www.ramseyfamily.com/).

The sketch is based on the work of the late psychic, Dorothy Allison, who claimed to have assisted police investigations. Allison, who died last year, came up with her vision of the suspect during a 1998 appearance on a network television show.

Boulder Police Chief Mark Beckner declined to comment on the psychic's work.

The Ramsey's Web site asks: "Have you seen this man? This man may have been in the Boulder area in December 1996. ... We firmly believe that this most horrible of killers will be caught based on information provided by people who care about right and wrong. ... Please help, so another innocent child will not be a victim and another family will not suffer unbearable grief."

The Ramseys have launched a much-publicized campaign they say is aimed at finding the killer of 6-year-old JonBenet, whose body was found beaten and strangled in the basement of their Boulder home on Dec. 26, 1996.

They also say they want Boulder police to stop focusing on them as possible suspects


2000-06-03: JonBenet's Parents Post Sketch by Deceased Psychic

JonBenet's Parents Post Sketch
By Deceased Psychic
http://fuckthemedia.com/

Saturday, June 3, 2000 Associated Sycophants

BOULDER, Colo. — John and Patsy Ramsey have posted a psychic's composite sketch of a suspect in their daughter's murder on their Internet site.

The sketch is based on the work of the late psychic, Dorothy Allison, who claimed to have assisted police investigations. Allison, who died last year, came up with her vision of the suspect during a 1998 appearance on a network television show.

Boulder Police Chief Mark Beckner declined to comment on the "psychotic's ... 'er psychic's" work.

The Ramsey's Web site asks: "Have you seen this man? This man may have been in the Boulder area in December 1996. ... We firmly believe that this most horrible of killers will be caught based on information provided by people who care about right and wrong. ... Please help, so another innocent child will not be a victim and another family will not suffer unbearable grief."

The Ramseys have launched a much-publicized campaign they say is aimed at finding the killer of 6-year-old JonBenet, whose body was found beaten and strangled in the basement of their Boulder home on Dec. 26, 1996.

They also say they want Boulder police to stop focusing on them as possible suspects. To help prove their point, millionaire John Ramsey has assembled a "Dreaming Team" of crack lawyers who previously represented Susan Smith and Timothy McVeigh.

"If people can believe that an evil car-jacking Negro can kidnap and drown Susan Smith's children in a lake, and that a vast right-wing conspiracy set-up Timothy McVeigh for the Oklahoma City bombing, why can't they believe me when I say a 'small foreign faction' killed that child ... what's her name ... JonBenet ...", Patsy Ramsey plaintively exclaimed during a recent appearance on the Larry King show.

Use your own Psychic Powers to determine who killed "that child":

A "God-Fearing, Church-Going Christian"

A "Small Foreign Faction"

A "Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy"

FuckTheMedia.com's staff called the Official Psychic Hotline in an attempt to verify the accuracy of John and Patsy's dead psychic. During our free 30 minute personalized prediction, besides learning that we are a shoe-in for the Pulitzer Prize, the Hotline faxed us a sketch of the person that their "real live expert psychics" are certain is the killer of JonBenet.

Asked if this latest twist in the case has changed his opinion of John and Patsy Ramsey, Colorado Governor Bill Owens replied in the negative, reminding us all once again that one can only imagine the horror that child must have suffered in her final moments.


2000-06-08: Barking Up the Wrong Tree - Playing the angles -- and angels -- in Boulder

Barking Up the Wrong Tree
Playing the angles -- and angels -- in Boulder.
By Patricia Calhoun
Article Published Jun 8, 2000

Two weeks until summer begins, and already the dog days are upon us.

They're snapping at our most exquisitely sensitive spots.

As might have been predicted, the most rabid area is Boulder, a town literally going to the dogs -- and the cats, and the ferrets, and the parrots -- as its city council contemplates putting real teeth in a measure that would officially change all references to "pet owners" in city ordinances to animal "guardians" instead. That sort of lunacy deserves no discussion -- but council members discussed it anyway on Tuesday night; at this rate, they'll wind up assigning patron saints to every bean and alfalfa sprout in the bins at Wild Oats.

In the meantime, all of Boulder's humans in desperate need of a guardian -- angel, legal or otherwise -- go wanting.

Exhibits A and B: The Ramseys. Although their daughter, JonBenét, was clearly the one who needed protection three and a half years ago from whomever -- whatever -- was preying on the six-year-old innocent, John and Patsy Ramsey have recently demonstrated their own dire need of guidance. While they left the cold comforts of Colorado three years ago for the more hospitable south, they continue to be inextricably entwined with Boulder -- as stars of the country's longest-running dope opera.

And lately, the action has been heating up. Two weeks ago, with new civil attorney Lin Wood at their side, the Ramseys addressed a hastily assembled press conference in Atlanta and revealed that they'd taken -- and passed (third time's a charm!) -- lie- detector tests administered by a respected polygraph examiner, who had graciously agreed to let them pay for the test. This revelation (although really, would you have expected them to reveal anything other than a positive result?) came after Wood's promise -- and in some cases, delivery on that promise -- to file suit against major media outlets that had pilloried the pair.

From there, the Ramseys took their show on the road.

They visited with Today's Katie Couric last Wednesday, in a reprise of their March interview after the release of The Death of Innocence (which is not exactly climbing the bestseller list). But while the first chat was rather chummy, Patsy Ramsey got downright snippy when former lapdog Couric referred to the lie-detector tests as "self-sponsored." That, Patsy said, was yet another example of biased media reporting.

No matter that the tests had indeed been self-sponsored; had the Ramseys wanted to take an independent -- not to mention free -- test, they could have done so three and a half years ago at the Boulder Police Department. Or later, under the watchful auspices of the FBI. But now, forty months after the murder of their daughter, the test results were too little, too late. They smacked of too much cramming and not enough instinctive knowledge.

Later that night, the Ramseys showed up for another test, this time an appearance on Larry King Live. And here the questions were more grueling, since the examiner was a real pit bull: former Boulder police detective Steve Thomas (whose book, released in April, is doing much better than the Ramseys' tome). Asked point-blank who had killed JonBenét, Thomas pronounced that he thought Patsy was "good" for it.

No guardian angel there.

Perhaps as a result of all these very public shenanigans, on Friday, H. Ellis Armistead, the private investigator (and former Lakewood cop) who'd been working for the Ramseys' local, more close-lipped legal team, resigned from his job. "Mr. Armistead has made this decision in light of the events that are taking place in the media," said a statement from his office.

But Armistead hadn't seen anything yet. The real light came on this past weekend, when the Ramseys posted a composite sketch of their daughter's possible killer on the family's Web site (ramseyfamily.com). And where had the sketch come from? From a psychic -- a dead psychic. Fortunately, Dorothy Allison, who died this past December, had created the sketch back in 1998, during a TV appearance.

Allison's prime suspect looks like a cross between Tim McVeigh, Fleet White, Adolf Hitler, the Unabomber and a schnauzer.

He also looks a lot like your boss, or the guy who delivers your mail, or the man who stood behind you at the grocery store, or the nutcase who tried to run you down last week.

"Have you seen this man?" the Web site asks. "This man may have been in the Boulder area in December 1996. We firmly believe that this most horrible of killers will be caught based on information provided by people who care about right and wrong...Please help, so another innocent child will not be victim and another family will not suffer unbearable grief."

And if that plea is not enough to convince you to hand over the goods -- the site offers a handy tipster link -- there's also a convenient reminder of the $100,000 reward that the Ramseys first announced back in May 1997, at the now infamous "Magnificent Seven" press conference. That was the couple's last official public appearance -- until they had a book to sell. And a two-year-old sketch to post on their Web site.

Also posted is a photograph of the garrote "used to strangle our little girl," as well as a picture of the sort of stun gun that might have immobilized her -- at least according to former Colorado Springs cop Lou Schmidt, who'd been assigned to work on the case by Boulder District Attorney Alex Hunter, then stayed on to help the Ramseys after the grand jury was disbanded without any indictments being issued. Not pictured: the Santa Bear that at one point seemed such a key to solving the murder.

Forty months, one Santa, two police chiefs, a half-dozen books, twice as many lawyers, and the case comes down to a psychic connection that makes Dionne Warwick look like Sherlock Holmes.

Two clicks away, FuckTheMedia.com has posted its own version of the sketch story, under the byline "Associated Sycophants." "John and Patsy Ramsey have assembled a You're Dreaming' team of crack lawyers who previously represented Susan Smith and Timothy McVeigh," the site reports, urging that you "use your own Psychic Powers to determine who killed that child.'" The choices: a God-fearing, church-going Christian; a small foreign faction; a vast right-wing conspiracy; or a large domestic faction. In case your psychic powers need prodding, the site also includes a sketch of the Ramseys' "most horrible of killers" -- this one bearing a marked resemblance to O.J. Simpson.

O.J., of course, has been all over the news this week, regarding the possibility that he, too, might take a lie-detector test. Truth is much stranger than fiction.

As they say, this dog won't hunt.

Except, perhaps, in Boulder.


2000-07-19: Scott Ross (The 700 Club) - The JonBenet Ramsey Case - Open or Shut?

Scott Ross interviews John and Patsy Ramsey
http://cbn.org/ScottRoss/interviews/The_JonBenet_Ramsey_Case_Part2.asp

The JonBenet Ramsey Case
Open or Shut? (Part 2)
By Scott Ross

Scott Ross interviews John and Patsy Ramsey July 19, 2000

SCOTT: The latest little deal to come out, it hit the press a few days ago, was the fact that you have now gone to a psychic?

JOHN: Not true.

SCOTT: Well … I have the article right here

JOHN: Read it in the paper has to be true! Let me dispel your image of that.

SCOTT: There it is. You put out a $100,000 reward to find this guy, and it's on your website.

JOHN: Our investigators control the web site. They put that picture on there. We did not contact a psychic as has been reported. The sketch that appeared on the web site that our investigators use was provided by Dorthy Allison on a television program a year or so ago. Our objective is to keep this alive in the public's mind, in hopes that the one lead that we are waiting for will come through.

SCOTT: So you allowed it to be used?

JOHN: We don't control the web site. The information that was put on there was put on there by our investigators, what they think is appropriate.

SCOTT: The reason why I raise the question because you claim to be Christians and you know, or I hope you know or have been taught, biblically, God doesn't look with whole lot of kindness on psychics or their practices.

PATSY & JOHN: Right. I know.

SCOTT: It's considered to be witchcraft ...

PATSY: Demonic.

SCOTT: And demonic. Now that might not make a lot of psychics happy, but I'm sorry, get over it. But that is what you have been accused of now and there is a distortion again?

PATSY: People look constantly for things to accuse the Ramseys about. This is just another one. Suffice to say -- the investigators, this was their doing -- they had the sketch.

JOHN: One of the reasons we are here today is to keep the pot stirred up.

SCOTT: You want to keep the pot stirred up?

JOHN: Absolutely.

SCOTT: Don't you want to go in a cave and hide out?

JOHN: Are you kidding, there are times we want to do that, but we want to find the killer. We are going to get one phone call that is going to lead us to the killer. This is not going to come now from clever detective work, it is going to come from the public. Someone out there knows who did this --they are going to call. We want to let them know where to call. We want to let them know we are still interested. When we get that call we got him.


[www.cybersleuths.com]2000-08-07: Cybersleuths Forum:
SketchMan Disappears From Ramsey Web Site!!!!!!!


SketchMan Disappears From Ramsey Web Site!!!!!!!

Adam
unregistered
posted 08-07-2000 08:32 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmmm...very interesting...I'm sure it's *JUST* a coincidence...

The Ramsey Web site--www.ramseyfamily.com--which of course John said they have NO control over (when confronted by the CBN interviewer who referred to psychics as "demonic") ... is NOW MISSING "SketchMan" drawn by a psychic!!

Hey John! For "not having any control over the content of your Web site" you SURE got the job done, buddy! Nice going, you multi-millionaire computer company CEO, you!

Now, how 'bout putting the Ransom Note on there at the Evidence page?????????? Is that asking TOO much, John?



Adam
unregistered
posted 08-07-2000 05:18 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
At the time of the 700 Club interview last month, "SketchMan" was prominently displayed on the Ramsey Family web site.

The 700 Club interviewer took a huge hard swing at the Ramseys having this "demonic" drawing at their Web site.

John then replied he has "no control over the content" of his OWN FAMILY's Web site.

I checked their Web site immediately after the 700 Club broadcast and it was still there; checked it yesterday & IT WAS GONE!!

ALSO: I noticed a couple months ago that the Ransom Note (even Patsy herself & John both agreed on LKL that it is The Most Important Piece of Evidence in this case) is NOT LOCATED ANYWHERE on the Ramseys' own Web site. I e-mailed them twice demanding to know why this EVIDENCE is NOT reproduced on their Web site to hopefully aid in the apprehension of the "real" killer... No response, no surprise.

On the other hand, they have a source-unknown, undated photograph of the non-existent stun gun at the Evidence section of the Web site.

But NO ransom note.

Who of the 65 people whose handwriting was compared with that of the phony ransom note has NOT been eliminated as the writer of the note??????

Hmmmmm...............


[Atlanta 2000 Interviews]2000-08-29: John Ramsey Interview - Atlanta, Georgia
(Screen Capture from "CBS 48 Hours - Searching for a Killer" 10/04/2002)

John Ramsey Interview - Atlanta, Georgia - August 29, 2000
Interviewed by: Michael Kane, Bruce Levine, Mitch Morrissey,
Mark Beckner, Tom Wickman, Tom Trujillo and Jane Harmer

Ramsey Representatives Present: Lin Wood, Ollie Gray,
and John San Augustine


http://www.jonbenetindexguide.com/2000ATL-John-Interview-Complete.htm

John Ramsey Interview - Atlanta, Georgia - August 29, 2000 - Interviewed by: Michael Kane, Bruce Levine, Mitch Morrissey, Mark Beckner, Tom Wickman, Tom Trujillo and Jane Harmer (DOROTHY ALLISON DISCUSSION)

0009
4.A. Well, the -- and this is the file
5 I've kept of leads that come in on the
6 internet. And we have a tip line, we get
7 lots of letters, most of which are not of
8 any interest or value, but these are ones
9 that I kept. I sent these on to Ollie, and
10 I think probably he has sent them on to you.
11 These aren't necessarily inclusive.
12 This is just from a psychologist,
13 who had, I think, a good perspective on the
14 killer.

15 This is the Dorothy Allison stuff
16 which I believe you guys are familiar with.




0010
9 MR. WOOD: Has he been cleared
10 from your list. Are we wasting our time?
11 Tell us so we won't waste Ollie's resources.
12 They can go elsewhere.
13 Well, let me go get the 50-page
14 document which the Ramseys gave to you all
15 and you ask him what is significant.



0012
17 MR. WOOD: I have a 50 page
18 document we're going to go through,
19 gentlemen. You are not going to cut him off
20 and say he doesn't have information that he
21 thought was significant.
22 MR. KANE: I just want to ask
23 one follow-up --
24 MR. WOOD: Follow up after his
25 answer. We are going to talk about the

0013
1 September of '97 incident. We're going to
2 talk about all of this. You want him to
3 give you this information. And I hope you
4 do want it. That's why I would like him to
5 have that 50 page document in front of him
6 when he talks about this. Would you like to
7 have it, John?



0014
21 Here is a, this is a family

22 that -- oh, this is just some Dorothy
23 Allison information.
This is about a killer
24 of a six-year-old child.
25 One of my theories is, frankly,

0015
1 that the murder of a child is such a
2 horrible thing and so subhuman that there are
3 not many people around that do it. Here is
4 a fellow that murdered a six-year-old child,
5 or the name of a fellow. My contention is
6 that --

7 MR. KANE: Dorothy Allison, can I
8 ask, is that a psychic?
9 THE WITNESS: No, no, this was
10 from --
11 MR. WOOD: He is talking about
12 someone else now.
13 MR. KANE: No, but before you
14 said --
15 MR. WOOD: You are going to let
16 him finish what he's saying.
17 MR. KANE: Oh, come on. Lin,
18 I'm just asking who is Dorothy Allison for
19 the record.
20 MR. WOOD: Let him finish. Make
21 a note and --
22 THE WITNESS: Dorothy Allison was
23 on a television program. I believe she is a
24 psychic. I did not see it. I've never
25 have seen her. These are letters from

0016
1 people who have sent information based on
2 what they heard on the television program.

3 MR. KANE: I just wanted to --
4 MR. WOOD: It is going to be a
5 better procedure to let my client finish.
6 You are going to let my client answer his
7 question or you're going to leave. You're
8 not here to interrupt. Show some courtesy
9 and I will show it to you.
.

John Ramsey Interview - Atlanta, Georgia - August 29, 2000 - Interviewed by: Michael Kane, Bruce Levine, Mitch Morrissey, Mark Beckner, Tom Wickman, Tom Trujillo and Jane Harmer (DOROTHY ALLISON DISCUSSION)

0068
25 Q. You mentioned Dorothy Allison

0069

1 earlier. Is this Dorothy Allison the
2 psychic, she is now dead?
3 A. As far as I know. I heard she
4 is dead.
5 Q. Well, I said that. That wasn't a
6 question. Dorothy Allison is the Dorothy
7 Allison who was a psychic that's made
8 comments about this?
9 A. As far as I know. I never laid
10 eyes on Dorothy Allison, nor heard her. She
11 was on a television program about this case,
12 and we received information as a result of
13 some things she said in terms of leads.
14 Q. Okay. And that was part of that
15 packet you handed in there?
16 A. Uh-huh (affirmative).
17 Q. There was a sketch that was made
18 based on a description that she --
19 A. Right.
20 Q. -- created. Are you aware of
21 that, that sketch?
22 A. Yes.
23 Q. Have you gotten any leads as a
24 result of that sketch?
25 A. We have gotten -- I know the lead

0070
1 level went up dramatically when we put that
2 out there, and I think the reason for
3 putting it out there was to keep things
4 stirred up. One of our objectives certainly
5 has been to keep this active in the public's
6 mind.
7 Q. So after that --
8 A. Yeah, we got a lot of leads after
9 that.
10 Q. When you say you put it out
11 there, what do you mean?
12 A. It was put on our website by the
13 investigators.
14 Q. Okay. And you say after that, it
15 got put on your website, you got a lot
16 of --
17 A. Yeah.
18 Q. And is that still on your
19 website?
20 A. I haven't looked, but I don't
21 believe so.
22 Q. Why is that?
23 A. We are trying to keep the website
24 active so people come back. The whole
25 objective here is to keep it stirred up,

0071
1 keep it active.

2 Q. Is the ransom note on the
3 website?
4 A. It was -- well, the ransom note?
5 No, I don't think so. No, not that I know
6 of. I mean, I haven't seen it there.
7 Q. Was that a conscious decision not
8 to put it on?
9 A. I wasn't directly involved with
10 what went on that website from the beginning.
11 I don't know if it was a conscious decision
12 or not.
13 MR. WOOD: I think Ollie would
14 probably know.
15 THE WITNESS: I think it's on the
16 web in other places, I've been told.
17 Q. (By Mr. Kane) Have you been
18 involved in any efforts to publicize the
19 ransom note?
20 A. No. Not -- we wanted it released
21 early on based on strong recommendations that
22 that be done, but --
23 Q. But you haven't, yourself,
24 promoted that or anything?
25 A. Uh-uh (indicating negatively).

CHAIN OF EVENTS 2006


2006-08-17: Dead Psychic's Sketch Of JonBenet Killer Revisited

http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/9694322/detail.html
Dead Psychic's Sketch Of JonBenet Killer Revisited
Same Psychic Helped Colorado Authorities In Hunt For Accused Serial Killer

Wayne Harrison, Senior News Editor
POSTED: 8:53 am MDT August 17, 2006

DENVER -- Psychic Dorothy Allison believed she knew what JonBenet's killer looked like and provided a sketch to the Ramsey family, based on her visions.

The Ramsey family Web site published the sketch, asking the public, "Have you seen this man? This man may have been in the Boulder area in December 1996."

The sketch was also given to Boulder police, who continued to insist that nobody outside the family was likely involved in the crime.

[TheDenverChannel.Com]
Comparing the sketch side-by-side with that of a picture of suspect John Karr appears to show remarkable resemblance.

Allison originally came up with the sketch during a 1998 appearance on the nationally syndicated Leeza Gibbons Show. Allison died a year later.

The Ramsey family Web site at www.ramseyfamily.com was used to publish press releases as well as ads and flyers the Ramseys sent out in search for their daughter's killer in the spring and fall of 1997. One of the flyers contained the sketch given by Allison. The Ramsey family let the domain name of the Web site expire in 2004.

Four years before JonBenet's death, Allison assisted El Paso County investigators in the investigation of the slaying of Heather Dawn Church.

"She was very keen on children. That's what she used to go out for, children," said Allison's husband Bob Allison. "She'd like to go after killers of children."

''In 30 years, I've never had accurate information from a psychic,'' a veteran law enforcement officer told The Denver Post in 1995. ''But the information by Dorothy Allison was right on the money.''

In an interview from August of 1992, Allison said, "I keep seeing the man that took her. I keep seeing he had a problem. This much I can reveal to you. I know he had trouble with his hip and leg, and I'd like to kick the other one so he can't walk at all."

Robert Browne was later arrested and convicted in the killing of Church. Last month he admitted killing as many as 49 people across the United States.

In another strange twist in the Ramsey case, the man who originally arrested Browne in the Church slaying joined the investigation team looking into the slaying of JonBenet. Lou Schmidt said he always believed an intruder was responsible for the crime.

"She shouldn't have passed away. She would've been helping it right now," said Bob.

Bob said his wife kept copious notes about the Ramsey murder.

"She said that the killer crawled in through the cellar, went in through the window, upstairs and grabbed Jon Benet and that's all she would say to me," said Bob.

Bob said his wife would be joyous to see this case unfold.

Bob read from one of Allison's notes: "'This man went unnoticed in the house. The Ramsey's are not responsible for the death of the child. This is my true and honest belief.' She had written this March 21, 1998 at 8:20am."

Bob said authorities would come to Allison asking for help in many cases. But, he said, in the Ramsey case, Boulder police didn't contact her.

CHAIN OF EVENTS 1995
Unrelated to JonBenet Ramsey case but
Lou Smit used Dorothy Allison on the Heather Dawn Church case
Article below also states Tom Carney, a crime laboratory technician was the one
who thought to do an exhaustive mailing of quality photos of the prints to 92 LE agencies



1995-08-06: Dorothy Allison: "His name is Brown. But not like the color brown; not spelled that way"

Tracking Heather's KILLER - August 6, 1995
Investigation had many twists before it ended
Colorado Springs Gazette - Telegraph


Full Text (2536 words)
Tracking Heather's KILLER
Investigation had many twists before it ended
Marcus Montoya, Gazette Telegraph.
Colorado Springs Gazette - Telegraph.
Colorado Springs, Colo.: Aug 6, 1995. pg. B.1
Copyright Freedom Newspapers, Inc.

Aug 6, 1995

Elinor McGarry walked into the house, thinking the worst. It was an attractive, Spanish-style home on the quiet plains near Peyton. Yet something horrible had happened here.

This is the house where 13-year-old Heather Dawn Church lived. The house from which she had disappeared."I always try to go in and process a scene as an unknown, a worst -case scenario," McGarry said. "The worst case, of course, would be a homicide.

"She snapped photos of everything. She collected the girl's bedding and the black T- shirt she was last seen in. She put a silver earring into a paper evidence bag.

Then McGarry began looking for fingerprints. She concentrated on the window in the master bedroom. The screen had been removed, then placed back on the sill. The window was open when the mother left Heather in the house; it was closed when she got home.

She looked at the window sill and could see the prints. McGarry began dusting. The black volcanic powder clung to oils and sweat left behind, revealing crisp ridges and swirls. Three fingerprints and two palm prints were lifted and taped onto white cards bearing McGarry's mark: EMG-13.

It was the start of one of the most intense police investigations in Colorado history. Interviews and a review of the case file show that detectives would talk to hundreds of people, check out scores of sightings, consult psychics and identify at least 41 suspects. In all, the El Paso County Sheriff's Office and the FBI would collect 15 leather-bound volumes of dead-end evidence - and a single set of prints without an owner.

The prints belonged to Robert Charles Browne, a 42-year-old ex-con who lived a mile from Heather and her family. Browne had killed the girl on that September night in 1991, then dumped her body on a lonely, garbage-strewn mountainside some 30 miles away.

Detectives wouldn't know that for more than three years. It took that long for someone to penetrate the secret of those mysterious fingerprints.

A missed opportunity? Perhaps. But detectives assigned to Heather didn't get the kind of breaks that can make a case open and shut.

Most slayings are done by people who know the victim - family, friends, lovers. Death often results from a fight - over drugs, over money, over lost love. Connections between the killer and the killed are sometimes easily made. Witnesses come forward, someone talks too much. More often than not, homicides are solved within a week of the crime.

Heather's case fit none of those patterns. She had no enemies. She didn't know her killer. There were no witnesses. Her remains weren't even discovered until two years after she vanished from that attractive, Spanish-style home on the plains near Peyton.

Indeed, from the very beginning it was a hard case to solve. About as hard as they come.

Investigators chased every lead they heard.

Heather disappeared between 8:30 and 10:15 p.m. Sept. 17, 1991. She was baby-sitting her then 5-year-old brother while her mother took two other brothers to a Scout meeting.

When her mother, Diane Wilson, returned, the 5-year-old was asleep; Heather was gone. Wilson called her husband, Mike Church. No, he said, he hadn't heard from his daughter.

In 1991 in Colorado, 4,506 teens, 534 of them from El Paso County, were reported to be runaways. Some were fleeing a lousy home life, some acting out an adolescent adventure. Heather didn't fit those profiles. She was responsible, an A- student, a loving and obedient daughter. Even though Mike and Diane had been living apart for more than six months, she had a happy home life and loved both her parents.

This was no runaway, investigators decided. This was a kidnapping.

News of the crime spread quickly, shocking a community where little girls don't get snatched from their homes. Diane Wilson spearheaded a campaign to find her missing daughter while Mike Church quietly hired a private investigator. Thousands of missing person posters went up, each with a photo of the smiling, bespectacled girl. National organizations such as the Center for Exploited and Missing Children pitched in and America's Most Wanted broadcast the story. The Friends of Heather Dawn Church Foundation was formed to support the investigation.

There was no shortage of help. Officials, friends and volunteers fanned out in the fields around the Church home looking for signs of the girl. Among them was Sgt. Dave Bartels of the Sheriff's Office. His bloodhound, Dixie, picked up a promising scent on railroad tracks heading east. Driving and walking, they would follow that scent to western Kansas until Bartels realized the trail was leading nowhere.

There would be more blind alleys. Leads from people who claimed to have seen Heather flooded in. She was seen along the Peyton Highway, in a phone booth along Austin Bluffs Parkway, at a bus stop in Aurora. One woman insisted her 8-year-old grandson had "positively" seen Heather at Will Rogers Elementary School a week after her abduction. That was a day after she was spotted blindfolded in the back of a van.

One man said he talked with Heather at a Loaf 'N Jug. "The girl, who appeared to be 16, said that she had been in Emerald, Texas, for awhile," he told deputies. "That she's been married two or three times and had two or three children . . . When asked for her name, she hesitated and then said `Dawn.'

"After an America's Most Wanted segment, the sightings went national. Heather was working as a prostitute in Florida. She was attending a United Pentecostal Church in Oregon. She was treated in a hospital in California. Every tip was followed up with at least a phone call.

"Those first 18 months, everything was gone after," said Lt. Bill Mistretta, head of the sheriff's investigations division at the time. "There were absolutely no leads that weren't followed.

"Even when they came from left field.

Considering all the publicity, detectives figured they'd hear from psychics. Some detectives scoff at psychics; others are skeptical but willing to listen.

"I'm not going to disregard them," said Capt. Lou Smit, now head of investigations for the Sheriff's Office. "Sometimes, psychics come up with things you can't explain.

"And sometimes they come up with things almost too hard to believe.

A few weeks after the abduction, detectives heard from a woman who said she had information. Even though she was a patient at a mental health hospital, her doctor said one of her multiple personalities was a legitimate physic. So detectives drove her around the Pikes Peak region one day in November 1991. Their objective: find the coven of witches that had supposedly taken Heather.

Yes, the psychic told detectives, the coven was there, in that ranch near Lake George. Yes, she said again later that day, a second coven includes every resident of that subdivision off Briargate Boulevard.

Sheriff's Detective Stan Presley's written report was understated. "Claims that each and every individual in this area are coven members seemed to be unrealistic and slightly out of touch with reality.

"Detectives received several tips on Heather's resting place - near Stella and Baptist roads, between Briargate and the north Air Force Academy entrance. In June 1992, a psychic who had read about the case described a chamber of horrors vision that ended with Heather's funeral.

In hindsight, at least one report had some promise.

In 1992, Dorothy Allison, a noted New Jersey psychic who has worked with police across the country, called the Friends of Heather Dawn Church Foundation."

`I can tell you the killer's name right now,' "Allison remembered saying." `His name is Brown.'"But not like the color brown; not spelled that way.

"The words she used was `It was not the normal spelling, ' " said Chris Castle, a foundation volunteer.

No one is quite sure how the tip was pursued. The name was probably compared with those of everyone connected with the case, Smit said. Then it was forgotten.

Until Robert Charles Browne was arrested last March.

"When I heard the name I about fell over," Castle said.

Case put on back burner until remains were found.

As detectives continued digging, they came up with plenty of suspects. "You try to prove as well as disprove," Mistretta said. "But there were quite a number of people that could not be eliminated as viable suspects.

"On the list of suspects were the people closest to Heather - her parents.

Statistics show the vast majority of homicide victims were killed by someone they knew, so it was reasonable for investigators to question Diane Wilson and Mike Church.

The investigation put their lives under a microscope: How did the parents get along with the children? How were the children being raised? How were the children disciplined? Why was their marriage breaking up? Did they have financial troubles?

Both parents took and passed polygraph tests. Both of their alibis held up.

A suspect who looked particularly promising early on was a teenager with a juvenile record who lived in the area.

Dubbed the "bad boy" by detectives, he told them he and a buddy had taken his father's truck to go four-wheeling the night Heather disappeared. When questioned again he changed his story, saying he was home alone that night. His buddy failed a polygraph test. The "bad boy" remained near the top of the list well into this year. An investigation was made into an elderly man who reportedly knew the Church family. Detectives learned Heather supposedly told a friend the man had tried to touch her inappropriately. A detective recognized the man's name; she was investigating him in connection with a similar complaint. But he denied having anything to do with the abduction and he was ultimately crossed off the suspect list.

Another theory held that the kidnapper was a stranger, someone who broke into the home and snatched Heather.

It was a theory without a name until detectives stumbled upon Robert Charles Browne.

In more ways than one, Browne was under the detectives' noses all along.

At 7:17 a.m. - the morning after the abduction - volunteer searchers approached Browne's mobile home. Browne, who had been sleeping, allowed them to look over his property. They were knocking at the next house by 7:28 a.m.

The same day, Elinor McGarry lifted what turned out to be Browne's fingerprints from the bedroom window. Every two or three months, the prints were run through the FBI's national fingerprint data base, which contains millions of images voluntarily submitted by police agencies across the country. Detectives kept hoping a match would be made.

A hit never came back. By February 1993, the case was put on the back burner - reluctantly, according to Mistretta.

"It became part of them; Heather became part of them," Mistretta said of his detectives. "There wasn't one of them who didn't adopt Heather in one way, shape or form.

"But nine months later, detectives got a break. Two years to the day of Heather's disappearance, a skull found by a drifter eight miles up Rampart Range Road was identified as hers. She had been hit over the head.

The investigation kicked into high gear again. Old suspects were re-interviewed. New theories were investigated. Fresh tips came in. Hundreds more hours were thrown on top of the thousands worked.

Nothing panned out.

Heather's parents started losing faith in the Sheriff's Office. For 2 1/2 years they had stood by the investigators.

But during the summer of 1994 they openly questioned the resolve of the Sheriff's Office.

"I'm sure it's not a No. 1 priority," Mike Church said.

"I think they've pretty much chased whatever leads they had," Wilson agreed. "I think they're kind of waiting for someone to get religion, or feel guilty or something.

"No one got religion. But in November, El Paso County got a new sheriff, John Anderson, a former Colorado Springs police sergeant. Anderson soon hired an old partner, Lou Smit, as head of investigations. Smit, who has a knack for solving old homicide cases, made Heather a top priority again.

Shortly after starting work last January, Smit reviewed Heather's file, a process he calls "messing with a case." He asked his investigators to come up with something new, something that hadn't been tried.

Tom Carney, a crime laboratory technician, immediately thought of the prints. "We knew those fingerprints had to be from the suspect," he said.

Carney understood the limitations of the FBI's fingerprint system: the quality of images is inconsistent. Plus, not every police agency submits prints to the FBI.

A better approach, he figured, would be an exhaustive mailing of quality photos of the prints to every police agency with an Automated Fingerprint Identification System. Like the FBI's system, AFIS compares fingerprint images electronically. AFIS computers aren't interconnected, but each one may contain prints that aren't in the hands of the FBI.

So Carney made 100 sets of photos of the three fingerprints and began sending them to 92 agencies with AFIS. Carney remembered thinking, "If this doesn't work, that's it.

"On March 24, someone from the Louisiana prison system called to report a match between the prints from the Church home and prints in its data base. The prints belonged to Robert Charles Browne. He had spent time in Louisiana prisons for various crimes, including auto theft, in the early and mid-1980s. He moved to Colorado in 1987 and, after living at several addresses, settled into a home just down the road from the Church residence. For the next four days, Browne couldn't move without investigators knowing about it. He swapped computer messages with a woman in Utah. He went shopping. He worked in the yard.

On March 28, detectives arrested him as he walked out of a downtown art supply store. Some 58 days later, Browne pleaded guilty to the murder of Heather, partly to avoid the death penalty. He was sentenced to life in prison with no chance for parole.

Investigators still don't know exactly what happened that night. Browne won't say. At his sentencing, he revealed only he was surprised by Heather after breaking into the home and killed her there. He never showed a drop of remorse in court.

Smit, for one, would like to know more. But he, like so many who became wrapped up in the case, is willing to let the details be.

"I know the family will live with it the rest of their lives," he said. "For them, it will never end.

"I'm not going to disregard them. Sometimes, psychics come up with things you can't explain." Capt. Lou Smit head of investigations for the Sheriff's Office

Caption: Gazette Telegraph - An FBI agent questions a motorist on Sept. 18, 1991, the day after 13-year-old Heather Dawn Church disappeared from her home on the plains near Peyton.; Caption: Mary Kelley/Gazette Telegraph - A skull found off Rampart Range Road in 1993 by a drifter turned out to be Heather Dawn Church's. Investigators returned with a bloodhound to search for more evidence in the teen-ager's slaying.; Caption: Mark Reis/Gazette Telegraph - Heather Dawn Church's grave is marked with this headstone at Evergreen Cemetery. The teen-age girl was slain in 1991.; BLACK & WHITE PHOTO; COLOR PHOTO

CLICK HERE: Flight 755 15th Street Main Directory



Home 1998 to 2007 ACandyRose©
E-Mail